The hits keep coming for the Philadelphia 76ers. Center Andre Drummond will be out at least for three games with a right ankle sprain, the team announced Monday. He will miss at least a week and be reevaluated this weekend. The 13-year veteran left Saturday’s win in Detroit after just 3:33 on the court. Drummond’s absence starts Tuesday night when the 76ers travel to Charlotte to take on the Hornets. Drummond has, like the rest of the 76ers, struggled significantly this season around the in-and-out of star players, in particular fellow center Joel Embiid. In 17 games (11 starts), Drummond is averaging 8.1 points and 8.2 rebounds per game. His field goal percentage has dropped to 52.4 after hitting 60.6 two years ago in Chicago. The 76ers are 29th in the league in rebounding. It’s the second game he’s missed this season, the other for an illness. Joining Drummond on the 76ers’ must-read injury report remains Embiid, out with left knee injury management/personal reasons. He’s stuck on four games played this year. But Kyle Lowry is listed as probable after missing the last five games with a right hip strain. Caleb Martin, who missed the last two games with a back strain, is also probable. It’s likely that the 76ers will have to go small against the Hornets. Guerschon Yabusele will likely start at center, with rookie Adem Bona getting an extended run off the bench. Expect some significant minutes as the de facto four for both Martin and Kelly Oubre Jr.
In the end, it is not just about winning or losing, but about the love of the game and the camaraderie shared among competitors. The Fearless Covenant Ant eSports National Challenge was a celebration of the spirit of competition and the dedication of all those involved in making it a success.In the wake of this tragedy, it is our collective responsibility to strive for a more just, understanding, and inclusive world where differences of opinion are met with dialogue and respect, rather than hostility and division. Let us honor the memory of the Wuhan University 985 elite female master's student by fostering a culture of compassion, kindness, and solidarity, both within our communities and beyond.
YouTube star MrBeast is cooking up a collaborative video with Portuguese football legend Cristiano Ronaldo — and he says it’s his biggest one yet. Jimmy ‘MrBeast’ Donaldson is the proud owner of YouTube’s most-subscribed channel, thanks to his big-budget viral videos and over-the-top challenges featuring top names in the creator space. While MrBeast has rubbed elbows with quite a few celebrities ever since reaching online fame, he shocked the world after appearing on Cristiano Ronaldo’s YouTube channel on November 21 in an unexpected meeting of the minds. In just one day, the video has racked up over 25 million views... but MrBeast’s upcoming portion of their collab might be even better. MrBeast’s “biggest video ever” to feature Cristiano Ronaldo On November 22, MrBeast was quoted as saying that he has “the biggest video ever planned with Cristiano Ronaldo on 30th November.” The influencer responded to this quote in a reply on X, boasting that it will “easily be my best YouTube video all year” and thinks “the football world is going to love it.” Easily will be my best YouTube video all year, I think the football world is going to love it 🥰 Fans are already wringing their hands in anticipation for the upcoming upload. Given MrBeast’s track record for challenging big personalities to absurd tasks, there’s no telling what he has in store for one of football’s most famous athletes. His current interview with Ronaldo has already sparked a big conversation online, particularly for the moment where he urged the sports star to make a video with streamer IShowSpeed, who’s arguably his biggest fan. Related: While Ronaldo had a non-committal answer, saying, “Good to know,” fans are equally excited for the possibility of this collaboration. However, it’s unclear if MrBeast’s video with Ronaldo will a candle to his forthcoming Amazon series ‘Beast Games,’ on which he spent a whopping $100M and broke several records.Furthermore, the WTT Grand Slam 2025 will also be a great opportunity for fans to experience the vibrant culture and hospitality of Singapore. As a melting pot of different cultures, the city offers a unique blend of culinary delights, bustling markets, and stunning attractions for visitors to explore and enjoy during their stay.“Gladiator II” asks the question: Are you not moderately entertained for roughly 60% of this sequel? Truly, this is a movie dependent on managed expectations and a forgiving attitude toward its tendency to overserve. More of a thrash-and-burn schlock epic than the comparatively restrained 2000 “Gladiator,” also directed by Ridley Scott, the new one recycles a fair bit of the old one’s narrative cries for freedom while tossing in some digital sharks for the flooded Colosseum and a bout of deadly sea-battle theatrics. They really did flood the Colosseum in those days, though no historical evidence suggests shark deployment, real or digital. On the other hand (checks notes), “Gladiator II” is fiction. Screenwriter David Scarpa picks things up 16 years after “Gladiator,” which gave us the noble death of the noble warrior Maximus, shortly after slaying the ignoble emperor and returning Rome to the control of the Senate. Our new hero, Lucius (Paul Mescal), has fled Rome for Numidia, on the North African coast. The time is 200 A.D., and for the corrupt, party-time twins running the empire (Joseph Quinn and Fred Hechinger), that means invasion time. Pedro Pascal takes the role of Acacius, the deeply conflicted general, sick of war and tired of taking orders from a pair of depraved ferrets. The new film winds around the old one this way: Acacius is married to Lucilla (Connie Nielsen, in a welcome return), daughter of the now-deceased emperor Aurelius and the love of the late Maximus’s life. Enslaved and dragged to Rome to gladiate, the widower Lucius vows revenge on the general whose armies killed his wife. But there are things this angry young phenom must learn, about his ancestry and his destiny. It’s the movie’s worst-kept secret, but there’s a reason he keeps seeing footage of Russell Crowe from the first movie in his fever dreams. Battle follows battle, on the field, in the arena, in the nearest river, wherever, and usually with endless splurches of computer-generated blood. “Gladiator II” essentially bumper-cars its way through the mayhem, pausing for long periods of expository scheming about overthrowing the current regime. The prince of all fixers, a wily operative with interests in both managing gladiators and stocking munitions, goes by the name Macrinus. He’s played by Denzel Washington, who at one point makes a full meal out of pronouncing the word “politics” like it’s a poisoned fig. Also, if you want a masterclass in letting your robes do a lot of your acting for you, watch what Washington does here. He’s more fun than the movie but you can’t have everything. The movie tries everything, all right, and twice. Ridley Scott marshals the chaotic action sequences well enough, though he’s undercut by frenetic cutting rhythms, with that now-familiar, slightly sped-up visual acceleration in frequent use. (Claire Simpson and Sam Restivo are the editors.) Mescal acquits himself well in his first big-budget commercial walloper of an assignment, confined though he is to a narrower range of seething resentments than Crowe’s in the first film. I left thinking about two things: the word “politics” as savored/spit out by Washington, and the innate paradox of how Scott, whose best work over the decades has been wonderful, delivers spectacle. The director and his lavishly talented design team built all the rough-hewn sets with actual tangible materials the massive budget allowed. They took care to find the right locations in Morocco and Malta. Yet when combined in post-production with scads of medium-grade digital effects work in crowd scenes and the like, never mind the sharks, the movie’s a somewhat frustrating amalgam. With an uneven script on top of it, the visual texture of “Gladiator II” grows increasingly less enveloping and atmospherically persuasive, not more. But I hung there, for some of the acting, for some of the callbacks, and for the many individual moments, or single shots, that could only have come from Ridley Scott. And in the end, yes, you too may be moderately entertained. “Gladiator II” — 2.5 stars (out of 4) MPA rating: R (for strong bloody violence) Running time: 2:28 How to watch: Premieres in theaters Nov. 21. Michael Phillips is a Tribune critic.
But even as the celebrations began, there was a sense of respect and admiration among all the teams. Each participant had given their all in the pursuit of victory, and the bonds forged in competition would last long after the final match was over. The spirit of sportsmanship and camaraderie that permeated the tournament was a testament to the power of e-sports to bring people together, regardless of background or experience.Authored by Jeff Carlson & Hans Mahncke via Truth Over News , The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is hiring a new chief for their virology section . That the federal government should not be hiring anyone, especially not senior staff, during the lame-duck period is self-evident. But what is in many ways even more notable about this appointment is that it reveals that the NIH has a virology section. One certainly could not have guessed this based on the people trotted out by Anthony Fauci during the pandemic , all of whom were from outside the NIH. Curiously, there has been no interest whatsoever from the media as to why that might be, especially since, as we can now all see, the NIH has its own virology branch. This latest revelation aligns perfectly with newly released emails from January 2021 , which gives us an insight into how NIH leadership was not only censoring critical voices in academia, such as that of Jay Bhattacharya, President-elect Trump’s likely pick as new NIH head, but also actively censoring its own experts. In one email, obtained last week by Jimmy Tobias after a years-long Freedom of Information Act battle , Carrie Wolinetz, the senior advisor to the director of the NIH, demanded outright censorship of an in-house NIH expert. The expert, David Resnick, who works in the NIH’s bioethics section, co-authored a paper discussing the merits (or lack thereof) of gain-of-function experiments. This worried Wolinetz because it might have prompted questions about the origin of Covid and the potential role the NIH may have played in the virus's creation: “I have some global concerns with the notion that an NIH employee would be providing what amount to critiques of HHS policy that is implemented by NIH, or suggestions that contradict messaging by NIH leadership.” The “HHS policy” which Wolinetz felt compelled to protect from any criticism, according to her own email, was based on a blog post by her superior, the then head of the NIH, Francis Collins. In his blog post, dated March 26, 2020, Collins expressed his strong opposition to the lab leak theory, which he called “outrageous.” The sole basis for Collins' post was the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper , published just a few days earlier. Collins failed to acknowledge that he, along with Fauci, played a significant role in orchestrating the publication of this fraudulent paper, which explicitly aimed to promote the natural origin theory while discrediting the lab leak theory. Wolinetz's justification for silencing a prominent colleague was so flimsy that the only reasonable conclusion one can draw from her actions is that she was helping Collins and Fauci to cover up their involvement in seeding the pandemic, which included outsourcing gain-of-function experiments on coronaviruses to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Notably, Wolinetz’s email had only one recipient: Lawrence Tabak , the then principal deputy director of the NIH, who would soon become the acting director, a position he held until 2023. In his reply , Tabak agreed to meet Wolinetz to talk about silencing Resnik. Even more notably, it took another three and a half years years for Resnik to finally publish his article in July 2024, by which time the NIH's deceitful natural origin narrative had largely collapsed. In the published article Resnik stated: “the idea that a biosafety lapse at the WIV—or some other laboratory for that matter—could have caused the COVID-19 pandemic is a very real possibility that has significant bioethical and public policy implications.” It is no wonder that NIH leadership was so eager to silence him. The implications of Wolinetz’s actions are significant. She pervasively infringed upon academic freedom, as well as on Resnik’s First Amendment rights. Typically, the media experiences a total meltdown when there is even just a suggestion that a government scientist has been silenced; in this instance, we have airtight evidence that this actually occurred. However, since the scientist in question may have made remarks that could be interpreted as mildly critical of Collins and Fauci, the media has completely overlooked the story. There are additional implications to consider , and this brings us back to the NIH's recruitment of a new chief virologist. The broader issue, which goes directly to the heart of the Covid origin cover-up, is that despite receiving in excess $60 billion annually from taxpayers and employing over 20,000 staff—many of whom are highly compensated scientists—Collins and Fauci completely disregarded their in-house experts regarding the origins of Covid. Instead, they brought in several conflicted scientists whose careers were entirely dependent on funding from Fauci. The scientists were subsequently tasked with writing the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper, along with other actions to further the cover-up, such as promoting the false natural origin narrative in the media. Not coincidentally, two of the scientists brought in by Fauci and Collins, Kristian Andersen and Robert Garry, had previously worked in a lab in Kenema, Sierra Leone, which is suspected to be the origin of the Ebola outbreak in 2014. Their expertise in covering up suspected lab leaks may explain why they were chosen. Notably, Andersen had no prior experience with coronaviruses. These external scientists, employed by Fauci to obscure the true origin of Covid, later collectively received over $50 million in grant allocations from Fauci. Andersen, the lead author of the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper, had an $8.9 million grant awaiting approval on Fauci's desk as he was tasked with leading the cover-up. As a general proposition, we were already aware that NIH’s own scientists had been excluded from the Covid origin issue. This was evident because the only names that consistently appeared in connection with Fauci and Covid’s origin were those of his hand-picked group of conflicted scientists, who relied on his financial support. However, the full extent of this exclusion was not revealed until the latest batch of emails was obtained . As is often the case in matters of government corruption, particularly regarding the cover-up of Covid's origins, the truth is even worse than we initially believed. Rather than merely ignoring or neglecting internal scientists, they were actively silenced by the director's office. It cannot be overstated that, although the silencing of Resnik is a serious issue, it is likely just one of many such cases —for which we happen to have obtained incriminating emails. Who else has been silenced? How toxic must the work culture at the NIH be if no one, including Resnik himself, has spoken up? This entire episode further underscores the urgent need for a total overhaul of the NIH, or perhaps even its complete dissolution. Instead of being dedicated to scientific advancement, the $60 billion organization has become a hub of politics, cover-ups, and corruption. The new Trump administration cannot arrive soon enough.
s the holiday season approaches, so too does the busiest shopping season of the year—with shoppers expected to spend big. expects record high consumer spending this year—with people spending an average of $902 per person across gifts, food, decorations, and other seasonal items this holiday season—$25 per person more than last year, and $16 higher than the previous record set in 2019. A survey from debt.com found that plan to take on debt for holiday shopping this year. Experts say that it is possible to shop without breaking the bank—it just requires a little planning. “You're giving your future self a gift by not overspending because of the financial stress that comes with that self-inflicted expectation that you need to do more or spend a lot on a particular item,” says Julia Lily, founder and wealth advisor at Ryerson Financial. Here are some tips to make holiday shopping more budget friendly this year. It’s helpful to be mindful of your spending habits year-round, but making a budget can be particularly useful around the holidays. “Create a spending plan to make sure that you have the right resources to allocate across all of those different gifting goals, versus doing what I call the close-your-eyes and swipe-the-credit-card shopping experience,” says Lily. To make a spending plan, Lily suggests taking stock of your fixed, monthly expenses—like rent or car payments, and “flex” expenses—like groceries or entertainment to get a sense of whether you might be able to cut back on one spending category to make room for another. Then, determine how much money you can allocate to holiday spending. Before you start shopping for yourself and others, write out a list of who you’re shopping for and what you really need—and stick to it. “Just like going to the grocery store with a list makes grocery shopping so much easier, going into holiday shopping with a plan will make things easier,” says Sarah Paulson, certified financial planner and owner of Valkyrie Financial. Having a list can also help you stay away from impulse spending––and the anxiety that sometimes follows it, says Lily. ““Taking that time to plan for who you want to gift to can really help make the shopping experience more enjoyable and less stressful,” she says. Don’t let the temptation of a good sale pull you into an unnecessary purchase.“The first question that I always encourage you to ask is, ‘Would you still buy this if it wasn't on sale?’” Paulson says. Instead, use sales as an opportunity to buy items that were already on your list, and keep an eye out for price-matching services that many retailers offer. According to a 28% of shoppers who used credit cards are still paying off last year’s holiday expenses. If you found yourself overspending last holiday season, Rosario Chacón, certified financial planner and founder of Wealth-Source Financial, recommends thinking back to your purchases to get a sense of what may have caused you to go overboard. “Was it a necessity, or was it something that [you] didn't think through?” says Chacón. “This is the time to think it through.” If you’re prone to overspending, Chacón recommends talking through your planned purchases with a loved one to help determine what’s necessary. Experts all recommend getting creative with your gifting—leaning into homemade gifts or gifts that revolve around spending time together. “Gifts don't only have to be something that you purchase,” says Lily. Also, holiday presents can be a good time to gift a family member something they actually need and use in their everyday life–especially if it’s something you might end up purchasing down the road anyways. “You’re not just buying things just because you have to give a gift, but [thinking about] what does that person need.” And, instead of buying gifts for every co-worker or friend, consider doing a “Secret Santa” style gift exchange—in which each individual is only responsible for one gift rather than a present for everyone in the group. Experts say that it’s fine to be upfront about what you can and can’t afford during the holiday season. “Having more honest and frank conversations around finances would help alleviate a lot of the stress around people feeling like they need to kind of keep up with the Joneses,” says Lily. For young kids, instill the idea that the holidays are about traditions and not just about gifts , says Charcón. “I think that could go a long way to teach children that is not about consuming, consuming and consuming,” she says. And remember, it’s the thought that counts. “No person who actually loves you wants you to go into debt to give them a gift,” says Paulson.
Title: Female Gamers Complain About Difficulty Pressing "W+Space Bar" Key Combination: Lenovo Official Online Tutorial
The Lingenfelter Collection hosting toy drive on Saturday, Dec. 7 benefitting Toys for Tots
After 15 rounds of Premier League matches, Chelsea under the management of Thomas Tuchel are on an impressive run, sitting at the second position in the league table. The team's current form and performance have drawn parallels to the successful era under former head coach Roberto Di Matteo in the 2012-2013 season.Trump has promised again to release the last JFK files. But experts say don’t expect big revelations
LITTLE ROCK, Ark.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov 26, 2024-- As the holiday shopping season kicks off this Black Friday, shoppers nationwide are gearing up to find the latest tech gifts for children. This year, the excitement over new gadgets is coupled with a growing concern for online safety, as highlighted by a recent survey conducted by Internet Service Provider, Kinetic. This survey, which involved 1,100 participants across 18 states, underscores a growing trend: consumers may be poised to prioritize cybersecurity features and parental controls when selecting tech devices for children. This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241125614797/en/ Kinetic Secure helps guard against cyber threats and inappropriate content. With these findings in mind, here are essential considerations for shoppers hunting for tech gifts this holiday season to ensure both safety and fun: “This holiday season, as you consider high-tech gifts for your family, don’t forget to prioritize the security of your children’s online experience,” said Ben Midanek, Kinetic’s chief marketing officer. “The best tech-gifts are those which provide entertainment for your family along with peace of mind for you. With Kinetic's advanced parental controls and security features, families can get the most out of their high-tech gifts on our ultra-fast fiber network and remain confident, knowing they’ve made the informed choice to create a safer place for their families.” Visit https://www.windstream.com/kinetic-secure-packs for more info. Also consider fiber technology that grows with new technology and purchases as it offers superior security by being resistant to interception and interference. Visit https://www.windstream.com/fiber-internet for more info. This study includes data from two surveys conducted Jul 25-31, 2024, and Jun 28-Oct 7, 2024, of 1,100 18-60-year-old respondents across Kinetic’s 18-state footprint. About Kinetic Kinetic, a Windstream company, offers fiber-based broadband to residential and small business customers in 18 states. The company’s quality-first approach connects customers to new opportunities and possibilities by delivering a full suite of advanced communications services. Kinetic is one of three brands managed by Windstream. The company also offers managed cloud communications and security services to mid-to-large enterprises and government entities across the U.S. as well as customized wavelength and dark fiber solutions to carriers, content providers and hyperscalers in the U.S. and Canada. Windstream is a privately held company headquartered in Little Rock, Ark. Additional information about Kinetic is available at www.gokinetic.com or windstream.com . Category: Kinetic View source version on businesswire.com : https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241125614797/en/ Megan Krtek,Megan.Krtek@windstream.com KEYWORD: UNITED STATES NORTH AMERICA ARKANSAS INDUSTRY KEYWORD: RESIDENTIAL BUILDING & REAL ESTATE SECURITY CONSTRUCTION & PROPERTY ENERGY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY SMALL BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CHILDREN FAMILY TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS CONSUMER INTERNET UTILITIES SOURCE: Windstream Holdings Copyright Business Wire 2024. PUB: 11/26/2024 02:00 PM/DISC: 11/26/2024 02:02 PM http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241125614797/enAs the story reached its crescendo, with Lady Conch's victims narrowly escaping her clutches through sheer wit and bravery, the audience was left with a sense of unease and disquiet. The comedian had succeeded in turning a seemingly light-hearted topic into a haunting and unforgettable cautionary tale.Academy ISD receives $330,000 grand for health science program