Jets say it looks ‘promising’ RB Breece Hall will play vs. JaguarsSyria’s Druze hope for better future without Assad
By Kanishka Singh WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said on Thursday his office launched investigations into over a dozen technology platforms over their privacy and safety practices for minors. Those being probed included artificial Intelligence chatbot startup Character.AI and fourteen other platforms like Reddit, Instagram and Discord, the Texas attorney general added. WHY IT’S IMPORTANT Tech platforms have come under increasing scrutiny over their impact on children. Top U.S. social media platforms made an estimated $11 billion in advertising revenue from users younger than 18 in 2022, according to a Harvard study published last year. U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy last year warned that young people using social media risked suffering body image issues, disordered eating, poor sleep quality and low self-esteem, especially among adolescent girls. KEY QUOTE “Technology companies are on notice that my office is vigorously enforcing Texas’ strong data privacy laws,” Paxton said. CONTEXT Social media companies have said they will work with officials to protect young users, and say they have introduced new tools designed to protect teens online, including parental control features. The firms had no immediate comment on Thursday. Paxton’s statement said the probes would focus on the platforms’ compliance with two Texas laws – the Securing Children Online through Parental Empowerment (SCOPE) Act and the Texas Data Privacy and Security Act (TDPSA). The SCOPE Act bans digital service providers from sharing, disclosing, or selling a minor’s personal identifying information without permission from the child’s parent or legal guardian. The legislation requires firms to provide parents with tools to manage and control the privacy settings on their child’s account. The TDPSA imposes notice and consent requirements on companies that collect and use minors’ personal data, Paxton’s office said. (Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Washington; Editing by Alistair Bell) Disclaimer: This report is auto generated from the Reuters news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. var ytflag = 0;var myListener = function() {document.removeEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);lazyloadmyframes();};document.addEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);window.addEventListener('scroll', function() {if (ytflag == 0) {lazyloadmyframes();ytflag = 1;}});function lazyloadmyframes() {var ytv = document.getElementsByClassName("klazyiframe");for (var i = 0; i < ytv.length; i++) {ytv[i].src = ytv[i].getAttribute('data-src');}} Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() );
The Shot Heard Around the Business World - And the Heroes of American BusinessHome of Mavericks star Luka Doncic is burglarized
NEW YORK, Dec. 13, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Value Line, Inc., (NASDAQ: VALU) reported financial results for the second fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2024. The Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q has been filed with the SEC and is available on the Company’s website at www.valueline.com/About/corporate_filings.aspx . Shareholders may receive a printed copy, free of charge upon request to the Company at the address above, Attn: Corporate Secretary. Value Line, Inc. is a leading New York based provider of investment research. The Value Line Investment Survey is one of the most widely used sources of independent equity investment research. Value Line also publishes a range of proprietary investment research in both print and digital formats including research in the areas of Mutual Funds, ETFs and Options. Value Line’s acclaimed research also enables the Company to provide specialized products such as Value Line Select, The Value Line Special Situations Service, Value Line Select ETFs, Value Line Select: Dividend Income & Growth, The New Value Line ETFs Service, The Value Line M&A Service, Information You Should Know Wealth Newsletter , The Value Line Climate Change Investing Service and certain Value Line copyrights, distributed under agreements including certain proprietary ranking system information and other proprietary information used in third party products. Value Line’s products are available to individual investors by mail, at www.valueline.com or by calling 1-800-VALUELINE or 1-800-825-8354, while institutional-level services for professional investors, advisers, corporate, academic, and municipal libraries are offered at www.ValueLinePro.com , www.ValueLineLibrary.com and by calling 1-800-531-1425. Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information In this report, “Value Line,” “we,” “us,” “our” refers to Value Line, Inc. and “the Company” refers to Value Line and its subsidiaries unless the context otherwise requires. This report contains statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future events or conditions (including certain projections and business trends) accompanied by such phrases as “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “will”, “intend” and other similar or negative expressions, that are “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Actual results for Value Line, Inc. (“Value Line” or “the Company”) may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the following: These factors are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Other unknown or unpredictable factors which may involve external factors over which we may have no control could also have material adverse effects on future results. Likewise, changes we make in our plans, objectives, strategies, or intentions, which may occur at any time in our discretion, could also have material favorable or adverse effects on our future results. Except as otherwise required to be disclosed in periodic reports required to be filed by public companies with the SEC pursuant to the SEC's rules, we have no duty to update these statements, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks and uncertainties, current plans, anticipated actions, and future financial conditions and results may differ from those expressed in any forward-looking information contained herein. www.val u eline.com www.ValueLinePro.com , www.ValueLineLibrary. c om Facebook | LinkedIn | Twitter Complimentary Value Line® Reports on Dow 30 Stocks Contact: Howard A. Brecher Value Line, Inc. 212-907-1500
EDMONTON - Alberta’s Technology Minister Nate Glubish says he’s hoping to see $100 billion worth of artificial intelligence data centres under construction within the next five years. Such centres are filled with computer servers used by companies like Meta to develop and train large-scale artificial intelligence models. Glubish says Meta, as well as other major companies including Google and Amazon, are on the hunt for space to build more facilities, and he wants Alberta to be an option. He says landing some data centres would create jobs and bring in much needed new tax revenue for the province. Glubish also says that since Alberta’s electricity grid regulations allows for off-grid power generation, he thinks the province is an ideal location. He says allowing for off-grid power connections where power generators supply data centres directly also means there’s less risk for Albertans, as there wouldn’t be major drains on the electrical grid. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Dec. 4, 2024.Draisaitl sparks Oilers with NHL-leading 21st goal and 3 assists in 7-1 win over WildSocial media users are misrepresenting a report released Thursday by the Justice Department inspector general's office, falsely claiming that it's proof the FBI orchestrated the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021. The watchdog report examined a number of areas, including whether major intelligence failures preceded the riot and whether the FBI in some way provoked the violence. Claims spreading online focus on the report's finding that 26 FBI informants were in Washington for election-related protests on Jan. 6, including three who had been tasked with traveling to the city to report on others who were potentially planning to attend the events. Although 17 of those informants either entered the Capitol or a restricted area around the building during the riot, none of the 26 total informants were authorized to do so by the bureau, according to the report. Nor were they authorized to otherwise break the law or encourage others to do so. Here's a closer look at the facts. CLAIM: A December 2024 report released by the Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General is proof that the Jan. 6 Capitol riot was a setup by the FBI. THE FACTS: That's false. The report found that no undercover FBI employees were at the riot on Jan. 6 and that none of the bureau's informants were authorized to participate. Informants, also known as confidential human sources, work with the FBI to provide information, but are not on the bureau’s payroll. Undercover agents are employed by the FBI. According to the report, 26 informants were in Washington on Jan. 6 in connection with the day's events. FBI field offices only informed the Washington Field Office or FBI headquarters of five informants that were to be in the field on Jan. 6. Of the total 26 informants, four entered the Capitol during the riot and an additional 13 entered a restricted area around the Capitol. But none were authorized to do so by the FBI, nor were they given permission to break other laws or encourage others to do the same. The remaining nine informants did not engage in any illegal activities. None of the 17 informants who entered the Capitol or surrounding restricted area have been prosecuted, the report says. A footnote states that after reviewing a draft of the report, the U.S. attorney's office in Washington said that it “generally has not charged those individuals whose only crime on January 6, 2021 was to enter restricted grounds surrounding the Capitol, which has resulted in the Office declining to charge hundreds of individuals; and we have treated the CHSs consistent with this approach.” The assistant special agent in charge of the Washington Field Office's counterterrorism division told the inspector general's office that he “denied a request from an FBI office to have an undercover employee engage in investigative activity on January 6.” He, along with then-Washington Field Office Assistant Director in Charge Steven D'Antuono, said that FBI policy prohibits undercover employees at First Amendment-protected events without investigative authority. Many social media users drew false conclusions from the report's findings. “JANUARY 6th WAS A SETUP!" reads one X post that had received more than 11,400 likes and shares as of Friday. “New inspector general report shows that 26 FBI/DOJ confidential sources were in the crowd on January 6th, and some of them went into the Capitol and restricted areas. Is it a coincidence that Wray put in his resignation notice yesterday? TREASON!” The mention of Wray's resignation refers to FBI Director Christopher Wray's announcement Wednesday that he plans to resign at the end of President Joe Biden's term in January. Other users highlighted the fact that there were 26 FBI informants in Washington on Jan. 6, but omitted key information about the findings of the report. These claims echo a fringe conspiracy theory advanced by some Republicans in Congress that the FBI played a role in instigating the events of Jan. 6, 2021, when rioters determined to overturn Republican Donald Trump's 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden stormed the Capitol in a violent clash with police. The report knocks that theory down. Wray called such theories “ludicrous” at a congressional hearing last year. The inspector general's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the false claims about its report. In addition to its findings about the the FBI's involvement on Jan. 6, the report said that the FBI, in an action its now-deputy director described as a “basic step that was missed,” failed to canvass informants across all 56 of its field offices for any relevant intelligence ahead of time. That was a step, the report concluded, “that could have helped the FBI and its law enforcement partners with their preparations in advance of January 6.” However, it did credit the bureau for preparing for the possibility of violence and for trying to identify known “domestic terrorism subjects” who planned to come to Washington that day. The FBI said in a letter responding to the report that it accepts the inspection general’s recommendation “regarding potential process improvements for future events.” — Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck .
Premier says to the U.S. has forced president-elect Donald Trump to sit up and pay attention. In response to Trump’s plan to slap 25 per cent tariffs on Canadian goods next month, Ford warned the country’s most populous province was prepared to retaliate, provoking a response from the incoming president. “It was the first time president-elect Trump said, ‘I want to make a deal with Canada.’ That’s good news,” the premier said Friday at the province’s emergency operations centre in North York. In separate news conferences, both Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland and Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc echoed Ford in the need to be hawkish with Trump. “We have to be candid about the reality of the incoming U.S. administration. This is an administration that believes in America first. This is an administration which is proudly an economic nationalist administration,” Freeland, who conferred with Ford Thursday night, said at the Toronto Stock Exchange. “This is an administration which openly has a strategy of creating economic uncertainty outside the United States as a strategy to discourage investment anywhere other than the United States. We’re realistic. We recognize that that is the case,” she said. LeBlanc, speaking in Fredericton, said “I’ve gotten to know Doug Ford and like him over the last number of years. “He’s certainly able to speak for himself,” the public safety minister said, acknowledging “other premiers have offered views on what might be the appropriate response.” While some about restricting energy exports — notably Alberta’s Danielle Smith and Quebec’s François Legault — the Ontarian shrugged off their stance. “If it comes to Alberta or Quebec, that’s their choice. They believe in diplomacy — good luck,” the premier said. Freeland, who will deliver a fall economic statement Monday detailing $1 billion in new spending on border security, stressed that “Canada will not escalate and Canada will not back down.” After a first ministers’ meeting Wednesday of the premiers and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau — along with Freeland and LeBlanc — Ford came out swinging. “We will go to the extent of cutting off their energy,” he said that night, referring to the electricity Ontario sells to Michigan, New York and Minnesota, which powers 1.5 million homes there. “Americans are going to feel the pain as well and isn’t that unfortunate.” The next day on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Trump was asked about Ford’s comments. “That’s OK if he that does that. That’s fine,” said the president-elect, who has vowed to impose the 25 per cent levies on Canadian and Mexican goods upon his Jan. 20 inauguration. “The United States is subsidizing Canada and we shouldn’t have to do that,” added Trump, who wants Canada and Mexico to tighten their borders to stem illegal immigration and fentanyl smuggling. “And we have a great relationship. I have so many friends in Canada, but we shouldn’t have to subsidize a country. We’re subsidizing more than $100 billion a year. We shouldn’t have to be doing that.” That appeared to be a reference to the amount Trump feels Ottawa needs to boost military spending in order to achieve its NATO target of defence spending equal to two per cent of gross domestic product. Ford said Friday the premiers agree “it’s absolutely essential that we hit our two per cent commitment to NATO.” Asked whether the LCBO should stop selling American wine, beer and spirits if Trump imposes tariffs, the premier said, “we’ll use every tool in our tool box” as in the 2019 trade war with Trump. “We put a tariff on bourbon last time. The LCBO is one of the largest purchasers of alcohol in the entire world, but I’d prefer not to do any of this. I’d prefer to make a deal.” In that vein, Ford spoke Thursday with New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer to assure them Canadians don’t want a trade war. “They fully understood where it’s coming from,” he said. “But again, my comment to the two governors yesterday — we want to sell you more energy.” On Monday, Ford will host a Council of the Federation meeting of the premiers in Toronto to discuss the trade crisis.Stephen Kessler | On devastation, reconstruction and renovationMaking Money From Crowd Stampede – Palantir Becomes Largest Defense Contractor In Blink Of An Eye
Alberta minister wants to see $100B in data centre infrastructure in next five years
'RIP Letter': Ram Charan's fan threatens to die by suicide over delay in Game Changer trailer [Details]Trump’s lawyers rebuff DA’s idea for upholding his hush money conviction, calling it ‘absurd’
