bet365 200 bonus
。
The leader of Sinn Fein has expressed determination to form a government of the left in Ireland as she insisted her party’s performance in the General Election had broken the state’s political mould. Despite Mary Lou McDonald’s confidence around shaping a coalition without Fine Gael and Fianna Fail – the two parties that have dominated the landscape of Irish politics for a century – the pathway to government for Sinn Fein still appears challenging. With counting following Friday’s election still in the relatively early stages – after an exit poll that showed the main three parties effectively neck-and-neck – there is some way to go before the final picture emerges and the options for government formation crystalise. Taoiseach and Fine Gael leader, Simon Harris, has dismissed talk of a Sinn Fein surge and said he was “cautiously optimistic” about where his party will stand after all the votes are counted. Meanwhile, Ireland’s deputy premier and Fianna Fail leader, Micheal Martin , insisted his party has a “very clear route back to government” as he predicted seat gains. The counting process could last days because of Ireland’s complex system of proportional representation with a single transferable vote (PR-STV), where candidates are ranked by preference. The early indications have turned the focus to the tricky arithmetic of government formation, as the country’s several smaller parties and many independents potentially jockey for a place in government. Ms McDonald told reporters at the RDS count centre in Dublin that she would be “very, very actively pursuing” the potential to form a government with other parties on the left of the political spectrum. The smaller, left-leaning parties in Ireland include the Social Democrats, the Irish Labour Party, the Green Party and People Before Profit-Solidarity. Ms McDonald said her party had delivered an “incredible performance” in the election. “I think it’s fair to say that we have now confirmed that we have broken the political mould here in this state,” she said. “Two party politics is now gone. It’s consigned to the dustbin of history and that, in itself, is very significant.” She added: “I am looking to bring about a government of change, and I’m going to go and look at all formulations. “If you want my bottom line, the idea of Fianna Fail and Fine Gael for another five years, in our strong opinion, is not a good outcome for Irish society. “Obviously, I want to talk to other parties of the left and those that we share very significant policy objectives with. So I’m going to do that first and just hear their mind, hear their thinking. But be very clear, we will be very, very actively pursuing entrance into government.” In Friday night’s exit poll, Sinn Fein was predicted to take 21.1% of first-preference votes, narrowly ahead of outgoing coalition partners Fine Gael and Fianna Fail at 21% and 19.5% respectively. Prior to the election, Fianna Fail and Fine Gael both ruled out entering government with Sinn Fein. Fine Gael leader Mr Harris rejected suggestions Sinn Fein had broken new ground. He told reporters in his count centre in Greystones, Co Wicklow: “Certainly we haven’t seen a Sinn Fein surge or anything like it. “I mean, it looks likely, on the figures that we’ve seen now, fewer people, many fewer people would have voted Sinn Fein in this election than the last one. “In fact, I think they’re down by around 5% and actually the parties, particularly the two parties, the two larger parties in government, are likely to receive significant support from the electorate. So definitely, politics in Ireland has gotten much more fragmented.” He said it was too early to tell what the next government would look like. “I think anybody who makes any suggestion about who is going to be the largest party or the construct of the next government, they’re a braver person than I am,” he said. “Our electoral system dictates that there’ll be many, many transfers that will go on for hours, if not days, before we know the final computations at all. “But what I am very confident about is that my party will have a very significant role to play in the years ahead, and I’m cautiously optimistic and excited.” Fianna Fail’s Mr Martin told reporters at a count centre in Cork he was confident that the numbers exist to form a government with parties that shared his political viewpoint. Mr Martin said it “remains to be seen” whether he would return to the role of Taoiseach – a position he held between 2020 and 2022 – but he expressed confidence his party would outperform the exit poll prediction. “It’s a bit too early yet to call the exact type of government that will be formed or the composition of the next government,” he said. “But I think there are, there will be a sufficiency of seats, it seems to me, that aligns with the core principles that I articulated at the outset of this campaign and throughout the campaign, around the pro-enterprise economy, around a positively pro-European position, a government that will strongly push for home ownership and around parties that are transparently democratic in how they conduct their affairs.” Asked if it would be in a coalition with Fianna Fail, Fine Gael and the Social Democrats, he said that would be “racing a bit too far ahead”. The final result may dictate that if Fianna Fail and Fine Gael are to return to government, they may need more than one junior partner, or potentially the buy-in of several independent TDs. Mr Martin said it was unclear how quickly a government can be formed, as he predicted his party would gain new seats. “It will be challenging. This is not easy,” he added. The junior partner in the outgoing government – the Green Party – looks set for a bruising set of results. Green leader Roderic O’Gorman is in a fight to hold onto his seat, as are a number of party colleagues, including Media Minister Catherine Martin. “It’s clear the Green Party has not had a good day,” he said. The early counting also suggested potential trouble for Fianna Fail in Wicklow, where the party’s only candidate in the constituency, Health Minister Stephen Donnelly, is considered to have a battle ahead, with the risk of losing his seat. Meanwhile, there is significant focus on independent candidate Gerard Hutch who, on Saturday evening, was sitting in fourth place in the four-seat constituency of Dublin Central. Last spring, Mr Hutch was found not guilty by the non-jury Special Criminal Court of the murder of David Byrne, in one of the first deadly attacks of the Hutch-Kinahan gangland feud. Mr Byrne, 33, died after being shot six times at a crowded boxing weigh-in event at the Regency Hotel in February 2016. A Special Criminal Court judge described Mr Hutch, 61, as the patriarchal figurehead of the Hutch criminal organisation and said he had engaged in “serious criminal conduct”. The constituency will be closely watched as other hopefuls wait to see if transfers from eliminated candidates may eventually rule him out of contention. In the constituency of Louth, the much-criticised selection of John McGahon appeared not to have paid off for Fine Gael. The party’s campaign was beset by questioning over footage entering the public domain of the candidate engaged in a fight outside a pub in 2018. The Social Democrats have a strong chance of emerging as the largest of the smaller parties. The party’s leader, Holly Cairns, was already celebrating before a single vote was counted however, having announced the birth of her baby girl on polling day.Published 9:20 pm Sunday, December 29, 2024 By Data Skrive The New Orleans Pelicans (5-27) are underdogs (+6.5) as they try to stop a nine-game losing streak when they host the Los Angeles Clippers (18-13) at 8:00 PM ET on Monday, December 30, 2024 at Smoothie King Center. The game airs on Gulf Coast Sports and FDSSC. Place your bets on any NBA matchup at BetMGM. Sign up today using our link. Catch NBA action all season long on Fubo. Sign up for NBA League Pass to get access to games, live and on-demand, and more for the entire season and offseason. Under (221.5) Put your picks to the test and bet on the Clippers with BetMGM Sportsbook. Looking for officially licensed NBA gear? Fanatics has jerseys, hats, apparel, memorabilia, trading cards, collectibles and more. Not all offers available in all states, please visit BetMGM for the latest promotions for your area. Must be 21+ to gamble, please wager responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, contact 1-800-GAMBLER .
Constitutional amendment for local bodies on the anvil Ahsan Iqbal says govt is working on consensus building with other parties on constitutional amendment ISLAMABAD: The government is working on building consensus with the other political parties on a constitutional amendment to get protection for local bodies including their funding through respective provincial finance commissions (PFCs). “We are working on consensus building with other parties on a constitutional amendment to get protection for local government and their funding through respective provincial finance commissions,” Minister for Planning Ahsan Iqbal confirmed when contacted by The News Thursday night. Earlier, the planning minister on Thursday met a 15-member delegation of Local Council Association Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Mardan. In the meeting, the federal minister was given a detailed briefing on the problems of local governments in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The delegation informed the minister that the local governments in the province had been paralysed for more than three years and the PTI government had given no administrative and financial support to 30,000 elected local government representatives in the province. The minister said that the fate of the people of Pakistan depends on how effectively the local governments are solving the problems related to service delivery in health, education and municipal administration. After the 18th Amendment, the powers given to the provinces have not been effectively devolved to local governments, he added. He stated that if the powers given by the federation to the provinces are accounted for, the efficiency of local governments will become clear. He emphasised that the local bodies should get the same support that the provincial bodies are getting. The minister further said that the centralisation of powers in each province is at the upper level, which needs to be transferred to the lower level immediately. Education, health, and municipal services are in poor condition, he stressed. He said that 50,000 local bodies were destroyed in Punjab during the PTI tenure which was a massive blow that affected public. The delegation of the local government representatives told him that the elected local government representatives will also hold a protest outside Adiala Jail on December 17 to plead for their rights. The federal government will fully support their constitutional and legal powers and rights, the minister said.Elon Musk warns Singapore and many other countries headed towards extinction from EarthRumble Stock Dips 11%, Insiders Seem To Have Made A Right Call By Selling EarlyWhen the Ireland team were presented jerseys for the final Test of 2024 against Australia at their Shelbourne Hotel base on Wednesday evening, they were given them by legendary former fly-half Ollie Campbell. The irony will not have been lost on experienced watchers of Irish Rugby. It was Campbell, after all, who formed one half of Ireland's first great number 10 debate. His back-and-forth with Tony Ward was perhaps the side's most famous divide over the most important jersey in the sport, but sequels would include David Humphreys over Ronan O'Gara and then O'Gara versus Johnny Sexton. That the latter would become the first name on the teamsheet for over a decade put a temporary halt to such chatter, but the skipper's retirement after last year's World Cup has brought about a widespread renaissance. Munster's Jack Crowley got the first crack and led the side to a fantastic win against France in the first game of the post-Sexton era that set up a Six Nations title triumph. The 24-year-old was still in situ by the summer tour to South Africa but the trip ended with replacement Ciaran Frawley snatching glory with a pair of late drop-goals to beat the back-to-back world champions in Durban. Crowley still started the defeat by the All Blacks to begin this month but underperformed in a showing that was down across the board. Against Argentina a week later, his strong first-half showing was seemingly lost in the shuffle after the debut of Sam Prendergast off the bench set tongues wagging. The Leinsterman was handed a first start against Fiji in game three of the autumn, his performance featuring a yellow card, a few mistakes, but plenty of the classy touches that have had the former under-20s standout marked as one to watch for quite some time. Conventional wisdom still indicated Crowley would return along with a group of frontliners against the Wallabies, especially when he was sat in front of the media in Dublin on Tuesday. If some attending journalists felt Crowley was downbeat that day, the reason for his demeanour became clear on Thursday when Farrell revealed his team and, a selection that otherwise was a return to the tried and tested, featured Prendergast's name nestled between Jamison Gibson-Park and Bundee Aki. Some, perhaps those looking through Munster red-tinted glasses, have already grown weary of the discourse surrounding the latest next big thing. Yet, in a game full of subplots, from the upcoming British and Irish Lions tour featuring the two head coaches to an Irish cap record for Cian Healy, come kick-off it felt like all eyes were trained on the 21-year-old in the green 10 jersey. In the main, Prendergast looked exactly what he is - a hugely promising player with just three caps to his name. There were some lovely touches, and more evidence of that languid style that seems to give him that extra split-second on the ball, as well as a few moments he would like back, namely a missed conversion and contestable kicks that yard or two too long. When, with 14 minutes remaining, Crowley entered the fray, he did so with the game in the balance. Ireland were 19-15 behind and pressing to avoid having their 150th anniversary celebrations spoiled by defeat. After what was surely a difficult week for a player without an abundance of Test experience himself, he contributed to the comeback with a prod in behind that set-up the line-out from which Gus McCarthy scored the winning try. His heart, though, will have been in his mouth when a kick out on the full gave Australia a chance to launch a late attack from halfway. "I thought Sam had some lovely stuff. He made some errors, some kicks that weren't perfect," said Andy Farrell. "But equally I thought Jack was excellent when he came on. "He took hold of the game. The little ball that he put into the corner, nice weighted kick, rather than just putting it out. We got the lineout from that that really kicked us on. "So delighted with them both." Questions about both have been a feature of this November, with Australia head coach Joe Schmidt neatly summing up how one will now be viewed through the prism of the other. When asked about the performance of Prendergast, the former Irish coach spoke about a player with "great potential" who had occasionally looked "a little bit flustered, which is unusual for him" against his Wallabies. Unprompted, he then added he "would be a fan of Jack Crowley as well", calling him he "a super player". Both now return to their provinces but to differing situations. Crowley is the undisputed first-choice at Munster. The man who finished the autumn in the Irish ten jersey, however, is yet to nail down that jersey at Leinster. It will be another two months before both are back in green. There will be no prizes for guessing the main topic of debate ahead of Ireland's Six Nations opener against England.
Middle East latest: Israeli strikes kill a hospital director in Lebanon and wound 6 medics in GazaSinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald first TD elected in Dublin Central but running mate Janice Boylan eliminated
Minnesota looks to stop skid vs. Bethune-Cookman
President-elect Donald Trump threatened Saturday to impose 100% tariffs on any BRICS nation that abandons the U.S. dollar. Trump warned the economic alliance — composed of markets in countries like Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa — that moving away from the U.S. dollar to create a new BRICS currency will not be taken lightly under his incoming administration. Trump made the comments on Truth Social today, in a post that warned the nine states that are BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) members against creating a new currency. pic.twitter.com/Jf6jDKSELh — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) November 30, 2024 “The idea that the BRICS Countries are trying to move away from the Dollar while we stand by and watch is OVER. We require a commitment from these Countries that they will neither create a new BRICS Currency, nor back any other Currency to replace the mighty U.S. Dollar or, they will face 100% Tariffs, and should expect to say goodbye to selling into the wonderful U.S. Economy,” Trump posted on Truth Social. “They can go find another ‘sucker!’ There is no chance that the BRICS will replace the U.S. Dollar in International Trade, and any Country that tries should wave goodbye to America,” he added. After Russia faced global sanctions for its war with Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin reportedly hoped to position BRICS — which has expanded to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates — as an alternative platform for international payments, Reuters reported in October. Earlier this month, Trump hit the ground running by threatening to impose a 25% tariff on all Mexican and Canadian goods until their governments take action to limit the onslaught of drugs and illegal migrants entering the U.S. (RELATED: Trump Taps Jamieson Greer To Be His Trade Chief) While Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum publicly suggested she would retaliate if Trump’s tariffs came to be, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau met with Trump at Mar-a-Lago on Friday, where the two had constructive conversations. “I just had a very productive meeting with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada, where we discussed many important topics that will require both Countries to work together to address, like the Fentanyl and Drug Crisis that has decimated so many lives as a result of Illegal Immigration, Fair Trade Deals that do not jeopardize American Workers, and the massive Trade Deficit the U.S. has with Canada,” Trump wrote on Truth Social on Saturday. “I made it very clear that the United States will no longer sit idly by as our Citizens become victims to the scourge of this Drug Epidemic, caused mainly by the Drug Cartels, and Fentanyl pouring in from China. Too much death and hardship!” Canadian PM Justin Trudeau meets President-elect Trump at Mar-a-Lago. pic.twitter.com/FnsXNYbLO6 — Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) November 30, 2024 “Prime Minister Trudeau has made a commitment to work with us to end this terrible devastation of U.S. Families,” the president-elect continued. “We also spoke about many other important topics like Energy, Trade, and the Arctic. All are vital issues that I will be addressing on my first days back in Office, and before.”PML-N agrees to conditional talks with PTI, demands withdrawal of civil disobedience callHomebound seniors living alone often slip through health system’s cracks
Thursday Night Football: BetMGM promo code CUSE1500 offers betting bonuses for Rams vs. 49ersA 9th telecoms firm has been hit by a massive Chinese espionage campaign, the White House saysTwo Canadian Cabinet ministers met with President-elect Donald Trump 's nominee for commerce secretary at Mar-a-Lago on Friday as Canada tries to avoid sweeping tariffs when Trump takes office. Finance Minister Dominic LeBlanc and Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly met with Howard Lutnick, Trump’s nominee for commerce secretary, as well as North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum , Trump’s pick to lead the Interior Department. Trump has threatened to impose 25% tariffs on all Canadian products if Canada does not stem what he calls a flow of migrants and fentanyl into the United States — even though far fewer of each cross into the U.S. from Canada than from Mexico , which Trump has also threatened. “Minister LeBlanc and Minister Joly had a positive, productive meeting at Mar-a-Lago with Howard Lutnick and Doug Burgum, as a follow-up to the dinner between the Prime Minister and President Trump last month,” said Jean-Sébastien Comeau, a spokesman for LeBlanc. Comeau said both ministers outlined the measures in Canada's billion-dollar plan to increase security at the border and reiterated “the shared commitment to strengthen border security as well as combat the harm caused by fentanyl to save Canadian and American lives.” Comeau said Lutnick and Burgum agreed to relay the information to Trump. The Trump transition team did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment. Further discussions are expected in the coming weeks. Joly will also have dinner with U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham on Friday. Trump has been trolling Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on social media in recent weeks by calling him the Governor of the 51st state. Flows of migrants and seizures of drugs are vastly different at the U.S.’s two land borders. U.S. customs agents seized 43 pounds of fentanyl at the Canadian border during the last fiscal year, compared with 21,100 pounds at the Mexican border. Most of the fentanyl reaching the U.S. — where it causes about 70,000 overdose deaths annually — is made by Mexican drug cartels using precursor chemicals smuggled from Asia. On immigration, the U.S. Border Patrol reported 1.53 million encounters with migrants at the southwest border with Mexico between October 2023 and September 2024. That compares to 23,721 encounters at the Canadian border during that time. Trump has also made an issue of the U.S. trade deficit with Canada, erroneously calling it a subsidy. Canada’s ambassador to Washington, Kirsten Hillman, has said the U.S. had a $75 billion trade deficit with Canada last year. But she noted a third of what Canada sells into the U.S. are energy exports and said there is a deficit when oil prices are high. About 60% of U.S. crude oil imports and 85% of U.S. electricity imports are from Canada. Alberta alone sends 4.3 million barrel s of oil per day to the U.S which tends to consume about 20 million barrels a day. Nearly $3.6 billion Canadian dollars ($2.7 billion) worth of goods and services cross the border each day. Canada is the top export destination for 36 U.S. states. Trudeau has told Trump that Americans would also suffer if the president-elect follows through on a plan to impose sweeping tariffs on Canadian products.
RAMON Technology Wins First Prize at the 4th Intelligent Manufacturing Innovation Competition 12-27-2024 06:46 PM CET | Leisure, Entertainment, Miscellaneous Press release from: Getnews / PR Agency: Stones_PR On December 20, 2024, the award ceremony for the 4th Intelligent Manufacturing Innovation Competition was held during the opening ceremony of the 2024 World Intelligent Manufacturing Conference. RAMON Technology with its participating project titled "Full-Process Intelligent System Solution for Steelmaking," proudly won the first prize at the competition. Image: https://www.globalnewslines.com/uploads/2024/12/15df1b9fcdc5569621f20b40c4dcb526.jpg By clicking a mouse or pressing a button, steelmaking can be achieved, eliminating the need for workers to be physically in hazardous environments and enabling them to operate the equipment and produce steel from the office. This magical scenario is not a fantasy but a reality in some steel plants in China today. Currently, AI technologies, represented by large models, are being widely adopted by Chinese enterprises and are accelerating the transformation of various industries. Against this backdrop, RAMON Technology has emerged and become a trusted partner for many steel companies around the world. The aforementioned "one-click steelmaking" production process is powered by RAMON Technology's core product: the One-Click Intelligent Steel Casting System. This system not only delivers superior product quality and a safer production environment but also enhances production efficiency while adhering to green and sustainable practices. Media Contact Company Name: RAMON Contact Person: He Siyuan Email: Send Email [ http://www.universalpressrelease.com/?pr=ramon-technology-wins-first-prize-at-the-4th-intelligent-manufacturing-innovation-competition ] Country: China Website: https://www.ramon.com.cn/ This release was published on openPR.Opposition to move impeachment motion against HC judge in Rajya Sabha today
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court seemed likely Wednesday to uphold Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors. The justices' decision, not expected for several months, could affect similar laws enacted by another 25 states and a range of other efforts to regulate the lives of transgender people, including which sports competitions they can join and which restrooms they can use. The case is being weighed by a conservative-dominated court after a presidential election in which Donald Trump and his allies promised to roll back protections for transgender people. The Biden administration's top Supreme Court lawyer warned a decision favorable to Tennessee also could be used to justify nationwide restrictions on transgender health care for minors. Supporters of transgender rights rally Wednesday outside the Supreme Court in Washington. In arguments that lasted more than two hours, five of the six conservative justices voiced varying degrees of skepticism over arguments made by the administration and Chase Strangio, the ACLU lawyer for Tennessee families challenging the ban. Chief Justice John Roberts, who voted in the majority in a 2020 case in favor of transgender rights, questioned whether judges, rather than lawmakers, should weigh in on a question of regulating medical procedures, an area usually left to the states. "The Constitution leaves that question to the people's representatives, rather than to nine people, none of whom is a doctor," Roberts said in an exchange with Strangio. Justice Neil Gorsuch, who wrote the majority opinion in 2020, said nothing during the arguments. The court's three liberal justices seemed firmly on the side of the challengers, but it's not clear that any conservatives will go along. People attend a rally March 31, 2023, as part of a Transgender Day of Visibility, near the Capitol in Washington. Justice Sonia Sotomayor pushed back against the assertion that the democratic process would be the best way to address objections to the law. She cited a history of laws discriminating against others, noting that transgender people make up less than 1% of the U.S. population, according to studies. There are an estimated 1.3 million adults and 300,000 adolescents ages 13 to 17 who identify as transgender, according the UCLA law school's Williams Institute. "Blacks were a much larger part of the population and it didn't protect them. It didn't protect women for whole centuries," Sotomayor said in an exchange with Tennessee Solicitor General Matt Rice. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said she saw some troubling parallels between arguments made by Tennessee and those advanced by Virginia and rejected by a unanimous court, in the 1967 Loving decision that legalized interracial marriage nationwide. Quoting from that decision, Jackson noted that Virginia argued then that "the scientific evidence is substantially in doubt and, consequently, the court should defer to the wisdom of the state legislature." ACLU lawyer Chase Strangio, left, and plaintiff Joaquin Carcano address reporters after a June 25, 2018, hearing in Winston-Salem, N.C., on their lawsuit challenging the law that replaced North Carolina's "bathroom bill." Justice Samuel Alito repeatedly pressed Strangio, the first openly transgender lawyer to argue at the nation's highest court, about whether transgender people should be legally designated as a group that's susceptible to discrimination. Strangio answered that being transgender does fit that legal definition, though he acknowledged under Alito's questioning there are a small number of people who de-transition. "So it's not an immutable characteristic, is it?" Alito said. Strangio did not retreat from his view, though he said the court did not have to decide the issue to resolve the case in his clients' favor. There were dueling rallies outside the court in the hours before the arguments. Speeches and music filled the air on the sidewalk below the court's marble steps. Advocates of the ban bore signs like "Champion God's Design" and "Kids Health Matters," while the other side proclaimed "Fight like a Mother for Trans Rights" and "Freedom to be Ourselves." Four years ago, the court ruled in favor of Aimee Stephens, who was fired by a Michigan funeral home after she informed its owner she was a transgender woman. The court held that transgender people, as well as gay and lesbian people, are protected by a landmark federal civil rights law that prohibits sex discrimination in the workplace. The Biden administration and the families and health care providers who challenged the Tennessee law urged the justices to apply the same sort of analysis that the majority, made up of liberal and conservative justices, embraced in the case four years ago when it found that "sex plays an unmistakable role" in employers' decisions to punish transgender people for traits and behavior they otherwise tolerate. Demonstrators against transgender rights protest Wednesday during a rally outside of the Supreme Court in Washington. The issue in the Tennessee case is whether the law violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment, which requires the government to treat similarly situated people the same. Tennessee's law bans puberty blockers and hormone treatments for transgender minors, but allows the same drugs to be used for other purposes. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, the administration's top Supreme Court lawyer, called the law sex-based line drawing to ban the use of drugs that have been safely prescribed for decades and said the state "decided to completely override the views of the patients, the parents, the doctors." She contrasted the Tennessee law with one enacted by West Virginia, which set conditions for the health care for transgender minors, but stopped short of an outright ban. Gender-affirming care for youth is supported by every major medical organization, including the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Psychiatric Association. For many trans and nonbinary people, bathrooms can be complicated places to navigate — a fact highlighted by the death of 16-year-old Nex Benedict in Oklahoma. Oklahoma is far from an outlier when it comes to failing to provide safe and equitable bathrooms for transgender people. According to the Movement Advancement Project, which tracks LGBTQ+ policy, 13 states have a policy that prevents transgender people from safely or legally using public bathrooms. But data shows that even in states with trans-friendly policies, transgender and nonbinary people report high rates of harassment in public bathrooms. Advocates say everyday people can have a big impact in interrupting discrimination in gendered restrooms. The 19th shows how anyone can help prevent abuse. Sex-segregated restrooms have historically been a hostile space for Tat Bellamy-Walker, a Seattle-based journalist and Black gender-fluid trans person. In graduate school and at journalism internships, they had to go far out of their way to find all-gender single-stall restrooms they could use safely. "You never forget being told you don't belong in a restroom, you never forget not having a place to dispose of sanitary products if you're on your period in the men's bathroom," Bellamy-Walker said. "It's just clear you do not belong in public spaces." Allies can help tremendously by locating and pointing out gender-neutral bathrooms to friends or family who might need them. This is especially important for people planning events or parties. Make sure your space has safe bathrooms. Carrie Soto, a South Dakota parent of a transgender child, said she lives by the mantra "see something, say something." That means speaking up when there is bullying and harassment and volunteering to accompany a trans/nonbinary friend or family member when they have to head into a public bathroom. "Validate a trans person's fears and anxiety about the situation," Soto said. " If [my daughter] uses a gendered restroom and feels anxious, I go with." It may seem obvious, but transgender health advocate Jamison Green notes this step can really help trans people feel safe. Consider first that according to 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey , 59 percent of trans people avoided using a public restroom due to fear of harassment. Data from 2022 found that 6 percent of trans people said they were physically or verbally attacked while trying to use a bathroom, while 4 percent were denied access to a bathroom. "If you see someone who you clock as trans or nonbinary, just smile or pay them a non-provocative compliment. ... Wish them good day or good evening, and move on," Green said. "Of course that only goes for the women's room! In the men's room, talking is extremely rare." Green recommends that cisgender people offer a kind, silent nod. Twenty-two states and Washington, D.C., allow residents to opt for "X" gender markers on their IDs in addition to selecting "M" or "F." Still, in every state, regardless of laws, most bathrooms in government buildings, schools, businesses, places of worship and cultural institutions are gendered. Advocates say people can help change this by simply asking businesses and building owners for more options to accommodate all genders. "Advocacy is the most important part of the fight for transgender rights," Lambda Legal notes in its guide to restrooms. "And if employers adopt pro-trans policies proactively, instead of waiting for a transgender person to pave the way, there's much less chance of having problems down the line." The internet is full of rants not appropriate for a news article about people using the only single-stall gender-neutral bathrooms available not for safety but for ... well, pooping. As a result, gender-neutral bathrooms, especially in airports, are almost always occupied. There are many reasons why a cisgender person might need a single-occupancy bathroom (accessibility, illness, child care and, yes, even a little more privacy). Just like accessible stalls, it's a kindness to leave gender-neutral restrooms unoccupied when you don't need them. Stay up-to-date on the latest in local and national government and political topics with our newsletter.Amid escalating concerns over a potential trade war, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump met with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in Florida to discuss pivotal topics including trade, border security, and energy. The meeting highlights Trump's pledge to impose tariffs on Canadian imports, raising alarms among trading partners. Trudeau's visit, set at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, focused on fostering collaboration to tackle the fentanyl crisis linked to illegal immigration and levelling out the U.S.-Canada trade imbalance. Both leaders voiced their dedication to jointly addressing these pressing challenges, emphasizing partnership amidst political tensions. Meanwhile, Trump warned the BRICS countries against developing an alternative to the U.S. dollar, threatening tariffs on those failing to comply. Trudeau, taking the tariff threats seriously, assured that proactive discussions would continue, aiming for harmonious bilateral relations. (With inputs from agencies.)Crisis in South Korea: Impeachment Motion Against President Yoon
McKewon: After seniors build bowl bridge, Matt Rhule and Nebraska football’s ‘Leap Year’ is here
NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Married couples across the U.S. have had access to no-fault divorce for more than 50 years, an option many call crucial to supporting domestic abuse victims and key to preventing already crowded family courts from drowning in complicated divorce proceedings. But some advocates for women worried as old comments from now Vice President-elect JD Vance circulated during the presidential campaign opposing no-fault divorce. After President-elect Donald Trump and Vance won the election, warnings began popping up on social media urging women who might be considering divorce to "pull the trigger" while they still could. Some attorneys posted saying they saw a spike in calls from women seeking divorce consultations. Donald and Ivana Trump pose in May 1988 outside the Federal Courthouse in New York after she was sworn in as a United States citizen. Trump — who is twice-divorced — hasn't championed overhauling the country's divorce laws, but in 2021 Vance lamented that divorce is too easily accessible, as have conservative podcasters and others. "We've run this experiment in real time and what we have is a lot of very, very real family dysfunction that's making our kids unhappy," Vance said during a speech at a Christian high school in California, where he criticized people being able to "shift spouses like they change their underwear." Marriage rates held steady but divorce rates of women age 15 and older declined from 2012 to 2022, according to U.S. Census Bureau data released in October. Despite concerns, even those who want to make divorces harder to get say they don't expect big, swift changes. There is not a national coordinated effort underway. States determine their own divorce laws, so national leaders can't directly change policy. "Even in some of the so-called red states, it hasn't gotten anywhere," said Beverly Willett, co-chair of the Coalition for Divorce Reform, whose group unsuccessfully attempted to convince states to repeal their no-fault divorce laws. A couple exchanges wedding bands Oct. 11, 2018, at City Hall in Philadelphia. Matt Rourke, Associated Press Mark A. Smith, a political science professor at the University of Washington, said while many Americans became accustomed to no-fault divorce being an option, Vance's previous comments on making it more difficult to separate from a spouse could help jump-start that effort. "Even though he's not directly proposing a policy, it's a topic that hasn't gotten a ton of discussion in the last 15 years," Smith said. "And so to have a national profile politician talk that way is noteworthy." Meanwhile, Republican Party platforms in Texas and Nebraska were amended in 2022 to call for the removal of no-fault divorce. Louisiana's Republican Party considered something similar this year but declined to do so. Listen now and subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | RSS Feed | SoundStack | All Of Our Podcasts A handful of proposals were introduced in conservative-led statehouses over the years, but all immediately stalled after they were filed. In January, Oklahoma Republican Sen. Dusty Deevers introduced legislation that would have removed married couples from filing for divorce on the grounds of incompatibility. Deevers backed the bill after writing a piece declaring no-fault divorce was an "abolition of marital obligation." Sen. JD Vance smiles as his wife Usha Vance applauds Nov. 6 at an election-night watch party at the Palm Beach Convention Center in West Palm Beach, Fla. Evan Vucci, Associated Press Similarly, in South Carolina, two Republican lawmakers in 2023 filed a bill that would have required both spouses to file for a no-fault divorce application rather than just one. In South Dakota, a Republican lawmaker attempted to remove irreconcilable difference as grounds for divorce since 2020. None of the sponsors of these bills responded to interview requests from The Associated Press. All are members of their state's conservative Freedom Caucus. Nevertheless, some Democratic lawmakers say they remain worried about the future of no-fault divorce. They point to the U.S. Supreme Court overturning the constitutional right to abortion in 2022 as an example of a long-accepted option that was revoked through a decades-long effort. "When you choose to be silent, you allow for this to creep in," said Democratic South Dakota Rep. Linda Duba. "These are the bills that gain a foothold because you choose to be silent." Before California became the first state to adopt a no-fault divorce option in 1969, married couples had to prove their spouse violated one of the approved "faults" outlined in their state's divorce law or risk a judge denying their divorce, said Joanna Grossman, a law professor at Southern Methodist University in Dallas. Qualified reasons varied from state to state, but largely included infidelity, incarceration or abandonment. Donald and Marla Trump wave to photographers Dec. 20, 1993, as they enter their wedding reception in New York's Plaza Hotel. Kathy Willens, Associated Press The system was a particular burden on domestic violence victims, who are often women who could be stuck in dangerous marriages while they try to prove their partner's abuse in court through expensive and lengthy legal proceedings. "If there was any evidence that the couple both wanted to get divorced that was supposed to be denied because divorce was not something you got because you wanted it, it was something you got because you've been wronged in a way that the state thought was significant," Grossman said. To date, every state in the U.S. adopted a no-fault divorce option. However, 33 states still have a list of approved "faults" to file as grounds for divorce — ranging from adultery to felony conviction. In 17 states, married people only have the option of choosing no-fault divorce to end their marriages. Photo Credit: shisu_ka / Shutterstock Marriage—and divorce—in the U.S. today are starkly different than in earlier eras of the country’s history. A series of economic, legal, and social shifts reshaped marriage in the second half of the 20th century. More women began working outside of the home in the post-World War II era, which provided avenues to financial security and independence outside of marriage. Greater emphasis on postsecondary educational attainment and career development have led young people to wait longer to enter marriage. States began to adopt no-fault divorce laws throughout the 1960s and 1970s that made it easier to end a marriage. Meanwhile, changing social and cultural attitudes have made it more common for couples to cohabitate, combine finances, and raise children prior to getting married—or without getting married at all. These trends have contributed to a decline in the overall number of marriages and to delays in when people get married for the first time. In the U.S., there are currently only 6.5 marriages per 1,000 people each year , compared to 10.9 five decades ago. For those who do choose to get married, the age of first marriage is happening later. As late as the early 1970s, the median age for a first marriage in the U.S. was just 22. By 2018, that figure had increased to 28.8. These shifts have also affected how likely married couples are to stay together. As women entered the workforce in the mid-20th century and feminism and the sexual revolution took hold, rates of divorce rose quickly throughout the 1960s and 1970s. From 1960 to 1980, the divorce rate per 1,000 people in the U.S. more than doubled from 2.2 to 5.2. But the rate began to fall steadily after 1980, and as of 2018, the rate of divorce had dropped to 2.9 per 1,000 people. Shutterstock The link between rates of divorce and age at first marriage has been borne out over time, but it also explains geographic differences in rates of divorce. Today, most of the states with the lowest rates of divorce are also those with a higher median age for marriage. States like New Jersey, New York, California, and Massachusetts all stand out for having fewer than 10% of adults divorced and an age at first marriage above 30. One exception to this is Utah, which has the lowest overall median age for first marriage at 25.5 but also the third-lowest share of divorced adults at 9%, likely due in part to the state’s strong religious ties to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints . In contrast, Maine and Nevada lead all states in the share of the population currently divorced at 13.9% and 13.8%, respectively. And at the local level, many of the cities with the highest levels of divorce are found in Florida, Appalachia, and the Southwest. The data used in this analysis is from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2020 American Community Survey . To determine the most divorced locations, researchers at ChamberOfCommerce.org calculated the percentage of adults currently divorced. In the event of a tie, the location with the higher percentage of adults currently separated was ranked higher. To improve relevance, only cities with at least 100,000 residents were included. Additionally, cities were grouped into cohorts based on population size: small (100,000–149,999), midsize (150,000–349,999), and large (350,000 or more). Here are the most divorced cities in the U.S. Photo Credit: Jacob Boomsma / Shutterstock Percentage of adults currently divorced: 12.7% Percentage of adults currently separated: 2.0% Percentage of adults currently married: 46.1% Percentage of adults never married: 34.9% Shutterstock Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock Percentage of adults currently divorced: 12.8% Percentage of adults currently separated: 2.7% Percentage of adults currently married: 28.5% Percentage of adults never married: 50.3% Shutterstock Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock Percentage of adults currently divorced: 12.9% Percentage of adults currently separated: 2.3% Percentage of adults currently married: 45.1% Percentage of adults never married: 34.2% Shutterstock Photo Credit: photo.ua / Shutterstock Percentage of adults currently divorced: 13.0% Percentage of adults currently separated: 1.5% Percentage of adults currently married: 49.9% Percentage of adults never married: 31.1% Shutterstock Photo Credit: Jonny Trego / Shutterstock Percentage of adults currently divorced: 13.0% Percentage of adults currently separated: 2.0% Percentage of adults currently married: 41.9% Percentage of adults never married: 36.6% Shutterstock Photo Credit: Tupungato / Shutterstock Percentage of adults currently divorced: 13.3% Percentage of adults currently separated: 2.2% Percentage of adults currently married: 39.7% Percentage of adults never married: 39.7% Shutterstock Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock Percentage of adults currently divorced: 13.5% Percentage of adults currently separated: 1.9% Percentage of adults currently married: 45.9% Percentage of adults never married: 33.4% Shutterstock Photo Credit: Kevin J King / Shutterstock Percentage of adults currently divorced: 13.5% Percentage of adults currently separated: 2.4% Percentage of adults currently married: 38.5% Percentage of adults never married: 40.5% Shutterstock Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock Percentage of adults currently divorced: 13.5% Percentage of adults currently separated: 3.4% Percentage of adults currently married: 24.7% Percentage of adults never married: 52.3% Shutterstock Photo Credit: Galina Savina / Shutterstock Percentage of adults currently divorced: 13.5% Percentage of adults currently separated: 3.5% Percentage of adults currently married: 36.8% Percentage of adults never married: 39.8% Shutterstock Photo Credit: f11photo / Shutterstock Percentage of adults currently divorced: 13.8% Percentage of adults currently separated: 2.0% Percentage of adults currently married: 43.8% Percentage of adults never married: 35.3% Shutterstock Photo Credit: CHARLES MORRA / Shutterstock Percentage of adults currently divorced: 14.0% Percentage of adults currently separated: 2.2% Percentage of adults currently married: 42.3% Percentage of adults never married: 35.8% Shutterstock Photo Credit: LHBLLC / Shutterstock Percentage of adults currently divorced: 14.3% Percentage of adults currently separated: 2.3% Percentage of adults currently married: 35.7% Percentage of adults never married: 42.5% Shutterstock Photo Credit: Valiik30 / Shutterstock Percentage of adults currently divorced: 14.6% Percentage of adults currently separated: 2.5% Percentage of adults currently married: 42.2% Percentage of adults never married: 34.7% Shutterstock Photo Credit: turtix / Shutterstock Percentage of adults currently divorced: 15.1% Percentage of adults currently separated: 1.4% Percentage of adults currently married: 39.8% Percentage of adults never married: 38.2% Shutterstock
Chief minister Siddaramaiah on Thursday opposed the Panchamasali Lingayat community’s demand for increased reservation, deeming it “unconstitutional”. Addressing the legislative council on Thursday, Siddaramaiah clarified that the move to reclassify the community from OBC Category 3B to Category 2A conflicts with constitutional provisions. “What you are demanding is against Article 340 of the Constitution,” he said virtually, adding that the community is not merely advocating but “pressurising” the government. The protests by the Panchamasali Lingayat community on Tuesday turned violent as the demonstrators attempted to enter the assembly premises. The community had initially launched peaceful protests demanding inclusion in the 2A category of the OBC reservation matrix, which provides 15% reservation, instead of their current 3B category that offers 5%. Clashes erupted when protesters allegedly threw stones at the police, prompting the lathi charge. A total of 24 people, including demonstrators and police personnel, sustained injuries. Many were detained including Basava Jayamruthunjaya Swami of Panchamasali Peetha, BJP MLAs Basangouda Patil Yatnal and Arvind Bellad, and Rajya Sabha MP Iranna Kadadi, police said. Siddaramaiah on Thursday explained that he had previously discussed the issue with Panchamasali seer Basava Jaya Mrutyunjaya. “I discussed with the seer twice and told him that the demand is unconstitutional and the decision of the previous government was also unconstitutional,” he said. While he acknowledged the right to protest, he stressed that such actions must align with constitutional principles. “Protesting is not wrong, but demanding something against the Constitution is not right,” Siddaramaiah added. Referring to the decision by the previous BJP government, led by Basavaraj Bommai, which restructured reservation quotas and reallocated 4% of the Muslim reservation, distributing it equally between Vokkaligas and Lingayats, Siddaramaiah said, “Why was this decision taken? Was it to appease the Panchamasalis or instigate Muslims?” He also highlighted an affidavit filed under the BJP government that assured no changes to Category 2A reservations “until further orders.” Heated debates rocked the Karnataka assembly on Thursday on the issue of police lathi charge on Panchamasali Lingayat protesters near the Suvarna Vidhana Soudha earlier this week. Home minister G Parameshwara defended the police action, while opposition BJP members demanded an apology from the government and a judicial inquiry into the incident. During the assembly session on Thursday, BJP legislators repeatedly disrupted proceedings, insisting on a statement from chief minister Siddaramaiah or home minister Parameshwara on the matter. Speaker UT Khader assured the opposition leaders that the issue would be addressed after the Question Hour, but protests led to the adjournment. When the House reconvened, Parameshwara defended the police action, stating it was necessary to maintain law and order. “Over 10,000 people had gathered at the protest site. Despite the government sending a ministerial delegation to receive their memorandum, the protesters insisted that the Chief Minister visit them, which was unreasonable,” he said. He further said that protesters had removed barricades and marched towards Suvarna Vidhana Soudha and also pelted stones at police personnel and injuring police personnel. “This government will not allow anyone to take the law into their hands, irrespective of their religion or community,” Parameshwara said. He added, “Should we welcome 10,000 protesters with kisses instead of trying to disperse them to maintain order?” Leader of Opposition R Ashoka condemned the lathi charge while drawing comparison with the previous BJP government peacefully handling a larger protest by the same community in Bengaluru. “The previous BJP government managed a massive Panchamasali Lingayat protest in Bengaluru without any violence,” he said. He demanded an apology from the government, action against the police officers involved, withdrawal of cases against protesters, and a judicial inquiry into the incident. Congress MLA Vijayanand Kashappanavar, himself a Panchamasali Lingayat leader, said the protest was politically motivated and orchestrated by BJP members. He also accused RSS elements of provoking the violence, a statement that led to heated exchanges between BJP and Congress legislators. “Chief minister Siddaramaiah is the one who ordered the installation of photos of Basavanna, founder of the Lingayat sect in all government offices. CM Siddaramaiah took oath on the occasion of Basava Jayanti, he can never be anti-Lingayat,” Kashappanavar said. Minister for revenue Krishna Byre Gowda said that it was the BJP that gave an undertaking in the Supreme Court regarding the non-implementation of reservation to the Linagayats and Vokkaligas. The BJP MLAs got enraged following the statements and started moving towards the Well of the House. At this stage, speaker Khader adjourned the House.A major Drug Summit is preparing to deliver their landmark report on how to address drug reform across NSW, with leaders promising there will be “no guard rails” placed on those trying to enact change across the state. Led by former NSW Liberal leader John Brogden and former Labor deputy premier Carmel Tebbutt, the summit began in Griffith and Lismore in November, with the fourth and final session beginning in Sydney on Thursday. NSW Health Minister Ryan Park said the report to be produced by Mr Brogden and Ms Tebbutt would not be given any “guard rails”. “They’ve been given no limitations,” Mr Park said. “They’ve been given no set agenda. While there are things that we will agree and not agree on — absolutely — that report will be handed to government in a faithful way. “The government will then, across its portfolios and ministers engage, review and report back, importantly, in a very timely manner.” He said the report will be made public, revealing the summit has “challenged” his own ideas. “It’s challenged my ideas. Each of the days I’ve left ... thinking, ‘What have I learned? What have I been challenged? What do I need to think about going forward?’,” Mr Park said. “And I hope over the next six hours each of you continue in that spirit. “That is how we truly reform, that is how we truly learn. “That is how we truly serve the communities and the people of NSW in a way that we’re all passionate about doing in our respective roles.” He said drug use is an issue that touches the entire community, and one that “seems to invade your entire existence” as a parent “because you see an issue at every corner”. “The young people yesterday reminded me that for them, they don’t always see drug use like that at all,” he said. “They don’t always see that through a frame of problem and problematic behaviour. And I say to those young people, thank you for challenging me.” Mr Park urged young people to “make sure (their) voice is heard to elected members of parliament” at the summit after speaking with some yesterday. “Your voice is critical, because in many ways, you are what we are all here for,” he said, thanking them for attending. He admitted the “issue of drug use (and) misuse” was not foreign to him as a father of two boys. “It’s something I’m living through every day of the week,” Mr Park said. “It’s an issue that I find myself regularly discussing in the true spirit as fathers trying to impart knowledge.” He said he comes to the summit not just as a health minister, but as a dad of a teenager. “So I do have that heavy responsibility of being the health minister, but also that heavy responsibility, trying to do my very, very best for parents and young people out there, navigating a world that was different to mine, but is different for them.” The NSW government has already committed to $9.3m in funding for drug and alcohol treatment services in the Murrumbidgee region, $21m for drug and alcohol services in northern NSW and $235m for alcohol and drug services across NSW. Pill testing is tipped to be one of the biggest hot topics at the summit, with the timing just weeks before Victoria will begin its pill testing trial at Beyond the Valley following the success of similar trials in ACT and Queensland.