poker game images Unionized Starbucks workers protested Christmas Eve, including in Davenport, asking for higher wages. Employees at the Davenport location on the corner of 53rd Street and Elmore Avenue picketed outside the location Tuesday morning, joining in a days long picket that has been making its way across the country. Starting Dec. 20, union workers started protesting at some of the franchise's largest locations in Seattle, Los Angeles and Chicago, with additional locations joining the strike each day since. Starbucks employees picket on the sidewalk next to the 53rd Street and Elmore location on Tuesday, Dec. 24, in Davenport. Starbucks Workers United is advocating for higher, more livable wages. On social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, the Starbucks Workers United union called it "the strike before Christmas." Among the complaints is that Starbucks is not holding up its end of the bargain by securing livable wages for employees. "Baristas are making the brave decision to strike because Starbucks backtracks on the path forward," a subsequent post read. "We’re protesting Starbucks’ failure to bring viable economic proposals to the bargaining table and to resolve hundreds of outstanding unfair labor practice charges." Alexis Miller, a union barista in Davenport, said the union was able to negotiate a $15 minimum wage last year and yearly raises for employees based on how long they were with the company. However, Miller called the percentages "pathetic" and said the average raise at the Davenport store was about 30 cents. The 53rd Street and Elmore Starbucks location, which unionized just this past May, joined many locations across the country in protesting for higher wages. "Which does not even keep up with inflation at this point," she said. In a statement on X, the union said Starbucks has proposed no immediate wage increase for union baristas but guaranteed 1.5% wage increases in future years. For a worker receiving $15 an hour, that's an increase of 23 cents. The union has doubled down on its request, claiming CEO Brian Niccol’s compensation package is worth $57,000 an hour while employees are receiving raises worth mere cents. Starbucks released a statement on Dec. 20 , claiming the unions ask was not feasible, considering the high pay and benefits employees already receive. Many passersby honked their horns and waved in solidarity during a picket at the Starbucks at 53rd Street and Elmore Avenue in Davenport on Tuesday, Dec. 24. "Workers United proposals call for an immediate increase in the minimum wage of hourly partners by 64%, and by 77% over the life of a three-year contract," the statement read. "These proposals are not sustainable, especially when the investments we continually make to our total benefits package are the hallmarks of what differentiates us as an employer — and, what makes us proud to work at Starbucks." In May, the Davenport store became the second in Iowa to unionize . An Iowa City store voted unanimously last May to make the move and was also reportedly striking Tuesday. Starbucks barista Alexis Miller chats with a customer at the drive thru menu while on strike on Tuesday, Dec. 24, in Davenport. Miller said it may seem unprecedented for fast food workers to be striking, but all workers deserve a living wage and to be heard by their employer. “I just want people to know that we can fight for better," she said. "This isn’t a typical union industry, but I would love for people to start seeing the possibilities in that; that everybody deserves better working conditions and higher wages and more autonomy in their work place.” Compensation is one of the most notable differences between unionized and non-unionized workers, as unions are often able to negotiate for higher wages. And as unions’ influence has declined over time, so too has the gap in compensation between union and non-union employee wages. At the height of unionization in the late 1970s and early 1980s, union members made over 30% more per hour than their non-union counterparts. Today, union members continue to earn more than non-union workers, but the gap between the two is just 11%. The new growth in union membership is unlikely to return the U.S. to historic levels of unionization, and union representation will continue to be stronger in some industries than others. Certain sectors of the economy have significantly higher rates of union membership than others, including transportation, utilities, public administration, and education. At the highest end, some industries have union membership rates greater than 50%. The data used in this analysis is from Unionstats.com . Researchers at Smartest Dollar calculated the union membership rate for 247 industries, ranking them from highest to lowest. In the event of a tie, the industry with the greater union coverage rate was ranked higher. Here are the most unionized industries. Photo Credit: Viewfoto studio / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Zivica Kerkez / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Feoktistoff / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Ground Picture / Shutterstock Photo Credit: LightField Studios / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Ryan DeBerardinis / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Billion Photos / Shutterstock After decades of declining power and influence, organized labor in the U.S. is making a comeback. The COVID-19 pandemic has set off a number of shifts in the labor market that have given workers more power. Labor participation rates fell sharply early in the pandemic and still have not recovered to pre-pandemic levels. The Great Resignation saw millions of workers leave their jobs in search of better pay or working conditions. With the labor market still tight, employers have struggled to recruit and retain employees. In this context, workers have been organizing at rates not seen in decades. One of the most high-profile examples is the union drive at Starbucks stores across the U.S. over the last year. Around 250 Starbucks locations have voted to unionize since the first Starbucks union formed in Buffalo, NY late in 2021. Employees at other major companies have also attempted unionization, including retail and factory workers at Apple and Amazon . And the trend extends to white collar industries like tech, academia, and media, where unionization has historically been limited. According to the National Labor Relations Board , 1,522 votes on unionization have taken place so far in 2022. This is the highest number of union elections since 2015 and an increase of more than 50% over 2021. The recent uptick in unionization could begin to reverse a decades-long decline in union membership rates. The peak of union membership over the last 50 years was in 1979, when 24.1% of American workers were union members. That figure has since fallen by more than half, with only 10.3% of workers in a union as of 2021. In raw numbers, there are nearly 7 million fewer union members in the U.S. now than there were in the late 1970s. Recent trends in unionization are significant to bother workers and employers. Unionization and collective bargaining materially affect the compensation and working conditions that workers experience, for better or for worse. In turn, these factors can affect employers’ ability to staff their businesses and the overhead costs they must pay to operate. Photo Credit: Andrey Armyagov / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Sergey Nemirovsky / Shutterstock Photo Credit: mavo / Shutterstock Photo Credit: People Image Studio / Shutterstock Photo Credit: DedMityay / Shutterstock Photo Credit: ersin ergin / Shutterstock Photo Credit: LeManna / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Drazen Zigic / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Billion Photos / Shutterstock Get the latest local business news delivered FREE to your inbox weekly. {{description}} Email notifications are only sent once a day, and only if there are new matching items.Judge denies Musk $56 billion Tesla compensation packageStock up on these popular board games for your next get-together

Trump's incoming envoy raises hopes of a 'free Imran Khan'

Donald Trump has tapped Keith Kellogg, a retired lieutenant general who presented him with a plan to end the war in Ukraine, to serve as a special envoy for the conflict, the president-elect wrote on Truth Social on Wednesday. Kellogg, who was the chief of staff for the White House National Security Council during Trump's 2017-2021 term and national security adviser to then-Vice President Mike Pence, will likely play a central role in attempting to resolve the conflict in his new position. While there is currently no special envoy for the war in Ukraine, Trump had privately expressed interest in creating the position. Quickly winding down the Ukraine war was one of Trump's central campaign promises, though he has avoided discussing how he would do so. "Keith has led a distinguished Military and Business career, including serving in highly sensitive National Security roles in my first Administration," Trump said on social media. Kellogg's plan for ending the war, which began when Russia invaded Ukrainian sovereign territory, involves freezing the battle lines at their prevailing locations and forcing both Kyiv and Moscow to the negotiating table, Reuters reported in June. Richard Grenell, Trump's former acting director of national intelligence, was also in the running for the job, Reuters reported on Friday. During a Bloomberg roundtable in July, Grenell had advocated for the creation of "autonomous zones" as a means of settling the conflict. Kellogg drafted his plan for Ukraine alongside Fred Fleitz, who also served as a chief of staff to the National Security Council under Trump. Under their proposed strategy, the U.S. would tell Ukraine that it would only get more American weapons if it enters peace talks. The U.S. would at the same time warn Moscow that any refusal to negotiate would result in increased U.S. support for Ukraine. NATO membership for Ukraine would be taken off the table for the immediate future. That plan would be unlikely to please Kyiv, given that it would in practice give Russia uncontested control of parts of eastern Ukraine, at least for a significant period of time. Additionally, some Republicans, particularly in the House of Representatives, would likely be reluctant to agree to more aid to Ukraine.Daily Post Nigeria EPL: Alan Shearer predict Man Utd, Chelsea, Arsenal Boxing Day fixtures Home News Politics Metro Entertainment Sport Sport EPL: Alan Shearer predict Man Utd, Chelsea, Arsenal Boxing Day fixtures Published on December 24, 2024 By Ifreke Inyang Newcastle United legend, Alan Shearer, has predicted the games that will be played over the Christmas period on Boxing Day and the day after. Liverpool are looking to maintain their lead at the top of the Premier League. Second-placed Chelsea take on Fulham and this season’s surprise package Nottingham Forest host struggling Tottenham. Struggling Manchester United are away to Wolves while Arsenal host relegation-battlers Ipswich Town. Shearer told BetFair: “Chelsea v Fulham – A London derby. Fulham were pretty weak in forward positions against Southampton and Chelsea didn’t get the result they wanted against Everton, but they’re back at home, so I’m going to go for a Chelsea win in this one. Prediction: Chelsea win “Wolves v Man Utd – Man United are really poor all over the pitch at this moment in time and will find this tricky. I’m going to go for a draw. Prediction: Draw “Liverpool v Leicester – Liverpool may smell blood here and they may get a few. Prediction: Liverpool win “Arsenal v Ipswich – Ipswich were awful against Newcastle, and they made them look poor. It looks as though Arsenal are going to be without Saka for period of time, which is a blow for them, having said that they should have enough to beat Ipswich. Prediction: Arsenal win.” Related Topics: Alan Shearer arsenal chelsea EPL man utd Don't Miss EPL: Amorim reveals when he will pick Rashford again You may like EPL: Amorim reveals when he will pick Rashford again EPL: Leny Yoro speaks on regrets over Man United move EPL: Aina named in Team of the Week EPL: He’s a good option – Arteta on player to replace Arsenal’s Saka EPL: He’s getting overlooked – Pennant claims Arteta doesn’t trust Arsenal star EPL: Amorim wants Man Utd to sign Chelsea target Advertise About Us Contact Us Privacy-Policy Terms Copyright © Daily Post Media Ltd

CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) — Derrin Boyd had 22 points in Charleston's 79-64 victory over Northern Kentucky on Wednesday. Boyd also added six rebounds for the Cougars (5-2). AJ Smith scored 12 points and added five rebounds and three steals. Justas Stonkus finished 4 of 4 from the field to finish with 12 points. The Norse (1-5) were led in scoring by Sam Vinson, who finished with 21 points, six rebounds and two steals. Trey Robinson added 12 points, 12 rebounds and five steals for Northern Kentucky. Dan Gherezgher Jr. also had 11 points. Boyd led his team in scoring with 12 points in the first half to help put them up 38-30 at the break. Charleston pulled away with a 7-0 run in the second half to extend a six-point lead to 13 points. Boyd led the way with a team-high 10 second-half points. The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar .

Regime Inaugurates a Biotechnology Company in China that Is One-Hundred Percent CubanChiefs head to Pittsburgh on Christmas hoping to lock up the top seed in the AFCMathias Brunet Makes a Big Statement on Patrik Laine, and There's an Update on His Injury

Patrik Laine 's recent statements continue to make headlines, both in Montreal and Columbus. Before the game against his former team, Laine made remarks that were not well-received , particularly by Zach Werenski , a leader of the Blue Jackets. During the game, Laine left after the first period, intensifying the discussions afterward. Mathias Brunet, a columnist for BPM Sports, stated that the Finnish player should have avoided making such comments, especially before facing his former club. - Brunet on Laine calling out his former team right before facing them A major statement from Mathias Brunet regarding Patrik Laine According to Brunet, these remarks served to motivate the opponent, a point also highlighted by Anthony Marcotte and Renaud Lavoie. The timing of his comments was deemed inappropriate. Unlike Don Waddell , who recently criticized a former organization, Laine was a key player for the Blue Jackets during their tough times. This makes his criticisms feel more personal, explaining the reaction of his former teammates. Given this tense context, Laine's health status becomes the next question. Is it a serious injury or merely a precaution by the Canadiens to protect him? Answers may take time, as the Canadiens don't play again for several days. If he can learn from this lesson, Laine will need to measure his words carefully to avoid generating unnecessary controversies. Do you personally believe Laine missed a good opportunity to stay quiet? For now, here's what we know about his upper-body injury: This article first appeared on Habs Fanatics and was syndicated with permission.