Germany's Merkel recalls Putin's 'power games' and contrasting US presidents in her memoirsChiefs offense hitting its stride with return of wide receiver Marquise Brown from injury
UK economy shrinks for second month, contracting 0.1% in OctoberUS crypto industry eyes possible day-one Trump executive orders
The Natick Select Board says it’s not looking to become the state’s next sanctuary city , but new rules up for a vote next week come very close. A debate has flared around what the board seeks to accomplish with its draft policy. Some residents say it gives an impression that the town wants to enact a sanctuary status while others argue it’s to protect immigrants already in town. Board Chairwoman Kathryn Coughlin’s car has also been targeted as tempers escalate, with a suspect defacing her vehicle in spray paint with the message “Deport illegals.” Police are investigating the incident. “Once a legal jurisdiction declares itself a sanctuary city, town, county, or whatever, ICE reserves the right to not coordinate with local police when operating within their jurisdiction,” Coughlin told residents Wednesday night. “We do not want that,” she added. “We want our police chief to know whoever is operating in town we want a safe environment.” Boston , Somerville , Northampton, Amherst Cambridge, Concord, Lawrence and Newton are the state’s eight sanctuary cities. Under Natick’s draft policy, town employees would be barred from inquiring about or collecting information regarding citizenship or immigration status unless required by federal or state law. Detaining a person based on the belief he or she is not in the U.S. legally or that the individual committed an immigration violation would violate the policy. Per a fact sheet published last week, the draft policy “shields town law enforcement personnel from liabilities resulting from local enforcement of federal immigration laws ... and the town from liability should a town employee violate the policy.” The policy does not “offer to provide shelter, housing, legal assistance, or other services to immigrants, documented or undocumented,” “apply to school employees,” nor “ignore ICE warrants or other judicial warrants for the arrest of individuals for criminal behavior.” Officials have highlighted how they must follow a 2017 ruling from the state Supreme Judicial Court that “extends to local law enforcement, and Natick must refrain from arresting or holding a person based on a federal civil immigration detainer.” Detainers , per the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement , request that local or state law enforcement “maintain custody of the noncitizen for a period not to exceed 48 hours beyond the time the individual would otherwise be released.” “This has nothing to do with declaring Natick a sanctuary city,” Select Board Vice Chairman Bruce T. Evans said. “It is a misrepresentation of what’s actually happening here.” Coughlin reiterated that “the timing of the rollout of this policy post-election is utterly coincidental” and “is not a reaction to recent elections nor is it in response to fear-mongering.” Between October 2022 and this October, a handful of meetings and emails unfolded between a concerned resident group, police and board leaders, and at times, town administration, Coughlin said. Stakeholders wanted to place a draft policy in front of the board as early as September but the process had been delayed due to other “pressing matters,” she said. Resident Carol Gates slammed the board for its transparency, saying she and many “longtime” neighbors” first heard about the issue in the Herald. She also highlighted how the board spoke about the policy on the day Laken Riley’s illegal immigrant murderer, Jose Ibarra, was sentenced. “Honestly, we felt, many of us, that you must think we are tone-deaf to national news and that we lack compassion for our fellow Americans because that was a brutal day to be announcing this policy.” Gates and other opponents are calling for the policy to be voted on at a townwide referendum. The MetroWest Daily News reported on Monday about Coughlin’s car being vandalized. “Intimidation is not an element of civil discourse,” resident Emily Wormington said. “It is a deterrent to it. Making our unpaid public servants feel unsafe serves only to frighten others regardless of their politics from becoming more engaged in our town.” Coughlin responded: “I have told the press that I will not be commenting. What I would like to say though is that many, most of the people that I know who are against this policy are friends. Most of them are really, really good people ... and I am thankful for that.” “For those who are debating on Facebook about whether it’s a false flag operation,” she added, “I think everyone in this room and everyone in this town can agree that it’s a bad actor.”