Luke Kromenhoek throws 3 TD passes as Florida St. ends six-game skid vs. Charleston Southern
( MENAFN - Jordan Times) By In 2024, Jordan's Economy witnessed several developments that highlighted a delicate balance between relative stability in certain indicators and the persistent structural challenges hindering sustainable economic growth. Despite the government's efforts to improve economic performance, local and regional conditions, coupled with global pressures, continued to constrain growth and development prospects. Economic growth in Jordan recorded a rate of 2.4per cent, according to estimates from the World Bank. Although this rate fell short of ambitious expectations, it reflects relative stability in a turbulent economic environment. The performance was supported by improvements in specific sectors, such as manufacturing and services. However, the slow pace of both local and foreign investment hindered a significant leap in overall economic performance. In the first half of the year, real growth reached 2.2 per cent, indicating a relative slowdown compared to the same period last year. Tourism played a crucial role in supporting the economy, with tourism revenue in June growing by 2.1per cent compared to 2023, reaching 455.8 million Jordanian dinars ($642.9 million). However, the first half of the year witnessed a 4.9per cent decrease in tourism revenue, dropping to 2.3 billion Jordanian dinars ($3.3 billion), due to a 7.9 per cent drop in tourist numbers. This decline highlights the need for greater efforts to diversify tourist markets and enhance the travel experience. Inflation remained relatively stable, with an annual rate of 1.54 per cent from January to November 2024. This stability was driven by the steady prices of key essential goods, despite the volatility in global energy prices. In November, inflation was recorded at 1.3 per cent, reflecting a balance between price pressures and government efforts to mitigate the impact of price fluctuations on the local market. Regarding public finances, the budget deficit continued to put pressure on economic performance, reaching -5.2 per cent of GDP from January to September. Public debt stood at 43.75 billion Jordanian dinars by the end of September, presenting a significant challenge for the government as it strives to balance expenditure funding while reducing debt levels. However, foreign reserves remained stable at $20.144 billion in November, reflecting the central bank's effective management of monetary challenges. The unemployment rate remained high at 21.5 per cent in the third quarter of 2024. This indicator reflects the ongoing structural challenges in creating job opportunities for youth and graduates, despite government initiatives aimed at encouraging employment. In the business environment, the banking sector performed positively, with bank deposits rising by 4.5 per cent year-on-year to reach 44.3 billion Jordanian Dinars. Foreign direct investment (FDI), however, remained below expectations, highlighting the need to enhance the investment environment by simplifying procedures and attracting more investors. In the first half of 2024, Jordan experienced a 4 per cent increase in FDI, reaching 413 million Jordanian dinars compared to 396 million in the same period of 2023. Despite this modest rise, foreign investment continues to pose a challenge. The data shows that Jordan's International Investment Position, which reflects the kingdom's net assets and liabilities, recorded a slight increase in external obligations, rising by 30 million dinars to reach 38.107 billion dinars by the end of the first half of 2024, compared to 38.077 billion dinars at the close of 2023. This suggests a marginal rise in Jordan's financial commitments abroad. It also indicates that Jordan continues to rely heavily on external obligations, with a significant gap remaining in efforts to reduce debt or improve its international financial standing. This could potentially impact the government's ability to sustain economic growth and attract more foreign investment. In the energy sector, the kingdom continued to expand its renewable energy projects to enhance independence and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. This direction will not only help reduce energy costs but also strengthen national efforts towards environmental sustainability. However, the import bill remains a burden on the current account, which recorded a deficit of -6.8per cent of GDP during the first half of the year. Despite some partial achievements, 2024 remains a year of challenges for Jordan's economy. Key challenges include reducing unemployment rates, improving living standards, and increasing growth rates by attracting more investments. As 2025 approaches, Jordan appears to have a significant opportunity to accelerate economic reforms and achieve a better balance between growth and social development. MENAFN28122024000028011005ID1109038313 Legal Disclaimer: MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.Credit Card Charge: Banks can charge more than 30% interest on credit card dues, know the reasons
SEOUL, South Korea , Dec. 26, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- LG Energy Solution (KRX: 373220) has announced its launch of the 'Battery Innovation Contest (BIC) 2025' to identify and support the next groundbreaking battery technologies. Innovators from universities and research institutions worldwide are encouraged to submit proposals until January 31, 2025 , at https://bridge.lgensol.com/ . Since its inaugural competition in 2017, BIC has been LG Energy Solution's flagship research contest. This year's edition has been revamped to foster greater collaboration between academia and industry. Selected researchers will receive annual research funding of up to USD 150,000 annually. Additional funding may be granted to projects making significant achievements through extended contracts. Unlike previous iterations of the competition, 'BIC 2025' allows participants to submit proposals on specific topics pre-announced by LG Energy Solution. "By presenting specific research optics, we aim to go beyond merely supporting academia and maximize the mutual benefits between the industry and academia," said an LG Energy Solution spokesperson. To facilitate active collaboration, LG Energy Solution has introduced the ' BRIDGE ' system, a platform designed to manage open innovation programs like BIC. The system facilitates seamless collaborations with features that help teams working on joint research projects track their objectives and deliverables. LG Energy Solution has unveiled the preselected 18 research topics for collaborative projects on the ' BRIDGE ' platform, such Battery Safety diagnosis algorithm technology and New materials for LFP Batteries topic. At the same time, the contest retains its traditional format to ensure participants are free to propose completely original research ideas. All research proposals must be submitted through the ' BRIDGE ' system. To protect the original ideas of every participant, LG Energy Solution has split the application process into two stages: initial proposals that provide concise information, followed by detailed proposals from a shortlist of candidates. This change aims to safeguard the ideas of researchers not selected for funding. "The BIC platform serves as a bridge of wisdom between members of academia and industry, driving technological innovation for the all-important battery sector," said Je-Young Kim , CTO of LG Energy Solution. "Through this initiative, we aim to provide differentiated value to our customers by strengthening our technology leadership." As of today, LG Energy Solution has supported 26 battery research projects through the 'BIC' initiative, with some evolving into large-scale projects that have received additional funding and resources. Thanks to the success of this competition, the company continues to establish partnerships with world-leading universities and research institutions, reinforcing its commitment to preparing the battery field for the future. About LG Energy Solution LG Energy Solution (KRX: 373220), a split-off from LG Chem, is a leading global manufacturer of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles, mobility, IT, and energy storage systems. With 30 years of experience in revolutionary battery technology and extensive research and development (R&D), the company is the top battery-related patent holder in the world with over 58,000 patents. Its robust global network, which spans North America, Europe, and Asia , includes battery manufacturing facilities established through joint ventures with major automakers. Committed to building sustainable battery ecosystem, LG Energy Solution aims to achieve carbon neutrality across its value chain by 2050, while embodying the value of shared growth and promoting diverse and inclusive corporate culture. To learn more about LG Energy Solution's ideas and innovations, visit https://news.lgensol.com . View original content: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lg-energy-solution-hosts-battery-innovation-contest-bic-2025-to-foster-breakthrough-battery-technologies-302339134.html SOURCE LG Energy SolutionBake Off viewers divided as winner crowned after asking 'what am I doing?'
DTE Energy Co. stock rises Tuesday, still underperforms marketASUNCION, Paraguay (AP) — Gaston Martirena and Adrian Martinez scored first-half goals as Argentina's Racing won its first Copa Sudamericana championship by beating Brazil's Cruzeiro 3-1 in the final on Saturday. Martirena opened the scoring in the 15th minute and Martinez added a goal five minutes later to give “La Academia” its first international title since 1988 when it won the Supercopa Sudamericana. “Maravilla” Martinez scored 10 goals in 13 matches and finished as the top scorer in the competition. Roger Martinez sealed the victory with a goal in the 90th. Kaio Jorge scored in the 52nd for Cruzeiro. ___ AP soccer: https://apnews.com/hub/soccer The Associated Press
It looked like a recipe for disaster. So, when his country's swimmers were being accused of doping earlier this year, one Chinese official cooked up something fast. He blamed it on contaminated noodles. In fact, he argued, it could have been a culinary conspiracy concocted by criminals, whose actions led to the cooking wine used to prepare the noodles being laced with a banned heart drug that found its way into an athlete's system. This theory was spelled out to international anti-doping officials during a meeting and, after weeks of wrangling, finally made it into the thousands of pages of data handed over to the lawyer who investigated the case involving 23 Chinese swimmers who had tested positive for that same drug. The attorney, appointed by the World Anti-Doping Agency, refused to consider that scenario as he sifted through the evidence. In spelling out his reasoning, lawyer Eric Cottier paid heed to the half-baked nature of the theory. People are also reading... "The Investigator considers this scenario, which he has described in the conditional tense, to be possible, no less, no more," Cottier wrote. Even without the contaminated-noodles theory, Cottier found problems with the way WADA and the Chinese handled the case but ultimately determined WADA had acted reasonably in not appealing China's conclusion that its athletes had been inadvertently contaminated. Critics of the way the China case was handled can't help but wonder if a wider exploration of the noodle theory, details of which were discovered by The Associated Press via notes and emails from after the meeting where it was delivered, might have lent a different flavor to Cottier's conclusions. "There are more story twists to the ways the Chinese explain the TMZ case than a James Bond movie," said Rob Koehler, the director general of the advocacy group Global Athlete. "And all of it is complete fiction." Something in the kitchen was contaminated In April, reporting from the New York Times and the German broadcaster ARD revealed that the 23 Chinese swimmers had tested positive for the banned heart medication trimetazidine, also known as TMZ. China's anti-doping agency determined the athletes had been contaminated, and so, did not sanction them. WADA accepted that explanation, did not press the case further, and China was never made to deliver a public notice about the "no-fault findings," as is often seen in similar cases. The stock explanation for the contamination was that traces of TMZ were found in the kitchen of a hotel where the swimmers were staying. In his 58-page report, Cottier relayed some suspicions about the feasibility of that chain of events — noting that WADA's chief scientist "saw no other solution than to accept it, even if he continued to have doubts about the reality of contamination as described by the Chinese authorities." But without evidence to support pursuing the case, and with the chance of winning an appeal at almost nil, Cottier determined WADA's "decision not to appeal appears indisputably reasonable." But how did the drugs get into the kitchen? A mystery remained: How did those traces of TMZ get into the kitchen? Shortly after the doping positives were revealed, the Institute of National Anti-Doping Organizations held a meeting on April 30 where it heard from the leader of China's agency, Li Zhiquan. Li's presentation was mostly filled with the same talking points that have been delivered throughout the saga — that the positive tests resulted from contamination from the kitchen. But he expanded on one way the kitchen might have become contaminated, harkening to another case in China involving a low-level TMZ positive. A pharmaceutical factory, he explained, had used industrial alcohol in the distillation process for producing TMZ. The industrial alcohol laced with the drug "then entered the market through illegal channels," he said. The alcohol "was re-used by the perpetrators to process and produce cooking wine, which is an important seasoning used locally to make beef noodles," Li said. "The contaminated beef noodles were consumed by that athlete, resulting in an extremely low concentration of TMZ in the positive sample. "The wrongdoers involved have been brought to justice." New information sent to WADA ... eventually This new information raised eyebrows among the anti-doping leaders listening to Li's report. So much so that over the next month, several emails ensued to make sure the details about the noodles and wine made their way to WADA lawyers, who could then pass it onto Cottier. Eventually, Li did pass on the information to WADA general counsel Ross Wenzel and, just to be sure, one of the anti-doping leaders forwarded it, as well, according to the emails seen by the AP. All this came with Li's request that the noodles story be kept confidential. Turns out, it made it into Cottier's report, though he took the information with a grain of salt. "Indeed, giving it more attention would have required it to be documented, then scientifically verified and validated," he wrote. Neither Wenzel nor officials at the Chinese anti-doping agency returned messages from AP asking about the noodles conspiracy and the other athlete who Li suggested had been contaminated by them. Meanwhile, 11 of the swimmers who originally tested positive competed at the Paris Games earlier this year in a meet held under the cloud of the Chinese doping case. Though WADA considers the case closed, Koehler and others point to situations like this as one of many reasons that an investigation by someone other than Cottier, who was hired by WADA, is still needed. "It gives the appearance that people are just making things up as they go along on this, and hoping the story just goes away," Koehler said. "Which clearly it has not." Be the first to knowLuke Kromenhoek throws 3 TD passes as Florida St. ends six-game skid vs. Charleston Southern
Comment Pat Gelsinger is out as Intel CEO, cutting short his nearly four-year crusade to revitalize the beleaguered chipmaker. Gelsinger's "retirement" as CEO and departure from the x86 behemoth's board of directors is immediate, having gone into effect on Sunday, though Intel didn't disclose the decision until today . The abruptness of Gelsinger's departure and lack of a succession plan suggest it probably wasn't voluntary. “I think the board made a decision or overruled a decision that Gelsinger thought was a bad one and he was out — likely related to the splitting Foundry from the design company.” Patrick Moorhead, chief analyst at Moor Insights and Strategy, told The Register . "Something happened in the last week." “I think people are missing the speed at which this went down. They backdated the announcement. He retired on December 1; it goes on December 2, right? He’s not on the board. He's not an advisor... There is a hard separation between the board and Pat,” he added. While Intel would never admit it, it wouldn't be the first time the board had lost faith in its chief exec. Former CEO Bob Swan's time at Intel ended rather abruptly in early 2021 amid pressure from activist investors and mounting pressure from competitors. His departure, of course, made way for Gelsinger's return as CEO that same year. In his stead, CFO David Zinsner and Michelle Johnson Holthaus, who runs Intel's Products division, have been named interim co-CEOs while the board searches for Gelsinger's replacement. Board member Frank Yeary, meanwhile, will take over as interim board chair. Gelsinger's return to Intel in January 2021, came as the chipmaker faced mounting pressure from rivals — most notably AMD, which has been steadily stealing market share from the x86 giant — as well as activist investors unhappy with its financial trajectory. His appointment was heralded as a turning point for Intel with many lauding the decision to put a proper engineer rather than a bean counter at the helm. And better yet, Gelsinger knew the chipmaker well. Prior to his time as COO of Dell EMC and later CEO of VMware, he'd spent nearly three decades at Intel where he helped architect the venerable 80486 before rising through the ranks to become the company's first CTO. At the time, Gelsinger's engineering background seemed like it was just what the doctor ordered as many of Intel's biggest hurdles were technological. Its 7nm process tech — since rebranded as Intel 4 — had been severely delayed by design flaws disclosed in mid 2020. At the same time, Intel was struggling to roll out its 10nm process tech, which wouldn't see widespread release outside the notebook space until early 2021. Also, AMD was already shipping its second-generation of Ryzen processors based on TSMC's 7nm process tech and Apple had just launched its M1 SoC on the Taiwanese foundry operator's 5nm tech. And while Intel's 10nm transistor densities may have been closer to TSMC's 7nm tech, public perception was that while Intel was the market leader, its technology was beginning to lag that of its rivals. Gelsinger aimed to change this while simultaneously charting a new and ambitious course for the chipmaker. A little over month after taking over, the newly appointed CEO announced plans to open the company's fabs to contract manufacturing with the formation of Intel Foundry Services and invest more than $20 billion in a pair of leading edge manufacturing plants in Arizona. Up until that point, Intel was one of the very few companies designing and manufacturing its own chips. The rest of the industry was busy gravitated toward a fabless model, with companies like AMD and Nvidia designing with industry-standard tools with hand-off of manufacturing to the likes of TSMC and Samsung. In the midst of a pandemic-fueled semiconductor shortage, Gelsinger saw an opportunity to challenge TSMC and overtake Samsung as the second largest foundry operator. During his tenure, he announced more than $100 billion in planned investments to massively expand Intel's manufacturing footprint across the US, Europe, and the Middle East. At the same time, Intel began development of next-gen manufacturing processes called Intel 20A and 18A, which were expected to close the gap with TSMC and Samsung's 2nm process nodes. Unfortunately for Gelsinger, realizing these ambitions wouldn't be easy. He was essentially starting from scratch with foundry being of limited utility until 18A and the fabs to produce it were ready in 2026. Despite Gelsinger's grand vision, he never could quite escape the perception that Intel was falling behind. While he was free to chart a new course with Foundry, he was burdened by a product roadmap too far along for a fresh start and (we suspect) overcoming that momentum proved more challenging than he'd bargained for. Arguably, the most embarrassing example of this was Intel's infamous 4th-Gen Xeon Scalable processors, better known as Sapphire Rapids. The chips were originally slated for release in 2021, but repeated setbacks and poor yields pushed its release back to early 2023 and even then, bugs in the product forced a brief halt in shipments for some SKUs. However, it wasn't just Intel that suffered as a result of the delays. An HBM-equipped variant of Sapphire Rapids was, alongside Intel's Ponte Vecchio GPUs, slated to power the Argonne National Laboratory's Aurora supercomputer. With a peak performance of nearly 2 exaFLOPS, the machine was expected to overtake the AMD based Frontier system at Oak Ridge as the United States' most powerful publicly known super. Unfortunately, the system fell short of expectations achieving just over an exaFLOP of double precision performance in the Linpack benchmark this spring. By this fall El Capitan's debut meant it would never claim the number one spot. This, it seems would be the final hurrah for Ponte Vecchio as, around the same time, Intel reportedly began sunsetting the product. Amid the AI boom, Intel shifted focus to its Gaudi3 accelerators in the hopes the chips would drive half a billion dollars in revenues in 2024. Those revenues, Gelsinger would later admit, would not materialize this year. Intel's client division wasn't without controversy either. Most recently Intel acknowledged a defect in its 13th and 14th-gen desktop CPUs which caused degradation and instability of the parts. Not long after, Intel announced its next-gen desktop CPUs, the first to use its all-new Intel 20A process tech, would instead be built by TSMC. Following Intel's earlier decision to manufacture its Lunar Lake mobile CPUs at TSMC, only a small number of products are still built in house. We'll note that very little of this was actually Gelsinger's fault. Product development for new silicon takes years and work on these chips almost certainly began well before he took over as CEO. The same can't be said of Intel's ailing foundry unit, for which the real reckoning came in early 2024 when Intel officially split off Foundry as a standalone unit and released revised financial reports revealing that the unit had bled $7 billion in 2023. In the quarters since, Intel Foundry has posted more than $11 billion in operating losses. Investors clearly felt lied to. The precipitous decline of Intel's share price — currently down 47 percent since the start of the year – has spurred multiple class action suits from investors who claim Gelsinger and Zinsner misrepresented the outlook of its foundry division. However, we'll note these losses really shouldn't have come as a surprise to anyone. While Gelsinger was busy building Intel up to be a foundry giant, its product division was shifting ever more of its production to TSMC. Gelsinger's insistence that production would begin to return home in 2025 with the launch of Clearwater Forest in the datacenter and Panther Lake on client side, it seems faith in Intel's ability to follow through on its promises has been lost. Just weeks after Intel posted a record breaking $16.6 billion loss in Q3, the largest in its history, Nvidia supplanted Intel on the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Gelsinger for his part has taken drastic action to get Intel's finances under control, having previously announced plans to lay off more than 15,000 staff — or about 15 percent of its workforce — by the end of the year, cut capital expenditures by 20 percent, and end quarterly dividends beginning in the fourth quarter. Gelsinger attempted to assuage investors by spinning off Foundry as an independent subsidiary with its own board, a move he argued would bring in new sources of capital for the ailing business. The announcement also saw Intel scale back its foundry expansion and "pausing" development of its €30 billion fab project in Magdeburg, Germany and $4.6 billion assembly and test facility in Wroclaw, Poland. The delay will no doubt cost Intel any subsidies it'd hoped to claim under the European Chips Act, as we don't anticipate the EU will fund delayed fabs. Without the funding, we suspect that "pause" may in fact be permanent. With Gelsinger out of the picture and no clear successor on the horizon Intel's future remains an open question. What we do know is whoever Intel finds to fill Gelsinger's shoes has one heck of a knot to untangle. For some, the obvious course would be to cut Intel's losses, abandon Foundry, and fully embrace TSMC as rival AMD has. As it is, Intel is already outsourcing production of many of its current-gen products. However, spinning off or even selling Foundry will be far more challenging than proponents of such a plan would have you believe . A spin-off would please Intel's investors, eager to get the blood off the books. But it's hard to see how a company now burning more than $5 billion a quarter is supposed to survive on its own even with Intel as a guaranteed customer. The reality is Intel Products is Foundry's only customer of consequence, and that's still not enough to turn a profit. It'll stay that way at least until 18A reaches volume production, which isn't until late 2026. The design tools necessary to harness older Intel process nodes either don't exist for outside customers or are limited to less attractive, legacy nodes. Further complicating the matter is the fact Uncle Sam has a vested interest in Intel's success. As we've previously discussed , Intel is the only domestic supplier of leading-edge process technology, arguably making it the most important chipmaker in the country with regard to US National Security policy. Because of this Intel has been awarded roughly $7.86 billion in CHIPS Act subsidies to support development of domestic fabs and is set to receive another $3 billion to establish a secret enclave for the development of leading edge chips for the US government. Taking this cash comes with its own restrictions, namely that Intel must retain 50.1 percent ownership or voting rights in the foundry unit if it is ever spun off. What's more, any spinout would require Intel to remain a Foundry customer. And so while Gelsinger will no longer be in the picture, he's made it exceedingly difficult to walk away from his foundry dream. ® Now read: With Gelsinger gone, who benefits from an Intel break up?ATLANTA — On Jan. 18 and 19 the AT&T Playoff Playlist Live! will be held at State Farm Arena in advance of the College Football Playoff national championship on Jan. 20. The star-studded lineup was announced Thursday at a news conference at Mercedes-Benz Stadium. Performances will include Lil Wayne and GloRilla on Saturday; and Camila Cabello, Myles Smith and Knox on Sunday. On game day, the Allstate Championship Tailgate, taking place just outside Mercedes-Benz Stadium in the Home Depot Backyard, will feature country acts on the Capital One Music Stage, including global superstar Kane Brown and iHeartCountry “On The Verge” artist Ashley Cooke. The concerts are just two of the festivities visiting fans can enjoy in the days leading up to the big game. The fan experience for both ticket holders and the general public has been a focus for event planners. All weekend long, an estimated 100,000 people from across the country are expected to attend fan events preceding kickoff. “It will be an opportunity for fans of all ages to come together to sample what college football is all about, and you don’t have to have a ticket to the game to be a part of it,” said Bill Hancock, executive director of the CFP in a press release. “We’ve worked closely with the Atlanta Football Host Committee to develop fan-friendly events that thousands will enjoy come January.” On Saturday, Jan. 18, Playoff Fan Central will open at the Georgia World Congress Center in downtown Atlanta. The free, family-friendly experience will include games, clinics, pep rallies, special guest appearances, autograph signings and exhibits celebrating college football and its history. That day, fans can also attend Media Day, presented by Great Clips, which will feature one-hour sessions with student-athletes and coaches from each of the College Football Playoff national championship participating teams. ESPN and social media giants X, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok will be taping live broadcasts from the event. On Sunday, Jan. 19, the Trophy Trot, both a 5K and 10K race, will wind its way through the streets of downtown Atlanta. Each Trophy Trot participant will receive a T-shirt and finisher’s medal. Participants can register at atlantatrackclub.org . On Sunday evening, the Georgia Aquarium will host the Taste of the Championship dining event, which offers attendees the opportunity to indulge in food and drink prepared by local Atlanta chefs. This premium experience serves as an elevated exploration of local cuisine on the eve of the national championship. Tickets to the Taste of the Championship event are available on etix.com . Atlanta is the first city ever to repeat as host for the CFP national championship. The playoff was previously held in Atlanta in 2018. “We are honored to be the first city to repeat as host for the CFP national championship and look forward to welcoming college football fans from around the country in January,” said Dan Corso, president of the Atlanta Sports Council and Atlanta Football Host Committee. “This event gives us another opportunity to showcase our incredible city.” The College Football Playoff is the event that crowns the national champion in college football. The quarterfinals and semifinals rotate annually among six bowl games — the Goodyear Cotton Bowl Classic, Vrbo Fiesta Bowl, Capital One Orange Bowl, Chick-fil-A Peach Bowl, Rose Bowl Game presented by Prudential and the Allstate Sugar Bowl. This year’s quarterfinals will take place on Dec. 31, 2024 and Jan. 1, 2025, while the semifinals will be Jan. 9-10, 2025. The CFP national championship will be Monday, Jan. 20, 2025, at Mercedes-Benz Stadium. For additional information on the College Football Playoff, visit CollegeFootballPlayoff.com . Get local news delivered to your inbox!
