wild queen casino
Shares of Rockfire Resources plc ( LON:ROCK – Get Free Report ) were down 8.9% during trading on Saturday . The company traded as low as GBX 0.16 ($0.00) and last traded at GBX 0.16 ($0.00). Approximately 40,381,969 shares were traded during mid-day trading, an increase of 91% from the average daily volume of 21,155,254 shares. The stock had previously closed at GBX 0.18 ($0.00). Rockfire Resources Stock Down 8.9 % The business’s 50-day moving average price is GBX 0.13 and its 200 day moving average price is GBX 0.15. The company has a market capitalization of £5.07 million, a P/E ratio of -2.20 and a beta of 0.38. About Rockfire Resources ( Get Free Report ) Rockfire Resources plc, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the mineral exploration in Australia. The company explores for gold, silver, copper, zinc, lead, and molybdenum deposits. It holds five exploration permits for minerals in Queensland; and an exploration and exploitation license in Greece. See Also Receive News & Ratings for Rockfire Resources Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Rockfire Resources and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .
Penn State's polarizing QB Drew Allar puts critics on mute and keeps winning gamesVance takes on a more visible transition role, working to boost Trump’s most contentious picks
Purdy hurt his throwing shoulder during a loss to Seattle on Nov. 17. Purdy underwent two MRIs last week that showed no structural damage. But Purdy he felt discomfort after making a few throws at practice on Thursday and was shut down for the game at Green Bay on Sunday that San Francisco lost 38-10 . Coach Kyle Shanahan said Monday that Purdy made it through the session without pain and will rest on Tuesday and hopefully be able to return to practice on Wednesday as the Niners prepare to play at Buffalo this coming week. “We rested it throughout the weekend hoping that would help,” Shanahan said. “He threw lighter today to see if that rest helps and the rest did help him. So we’ll see again, going through the same things we did last week. We’re going to let him rest all the way up to Wednesday. We’ll see how it feels on Wednesday and then we’ll take the exact same course throughout the week. Hopefully it responds better this week than it did last week with the rest.” Brandon Allen went 17 for 29 for 199 yards with a touchdown, an interception and a lost fumble in his first start since the 2021 season. Allen would play once again if Purdy is unable to go on Sunday at Buffalo. Purdy wasn't the only star player missing for the 49ers on Sunday with defensive end Nick Bosa missing the game with injuries to his left hip and oblique and left tackle Trent Williams out with an ankle injury. “Just waiting to see how they respond,” Shanahan said. “They didn’t respond great last week. That’s why they weren’t able to go. Nick and Trent are both in the same boat. ... We’ll evaluate as this week progresses and hopefully it turns a better corner than it did last week.” In other injury news, linebacker Dre Greenlaw will return to practice this week for the first time since tearing his Achilles tendon in the Super Bowl last season. Greenlaw will likely need at least a couple of weeks of practice before being able to return to play. Offensive lineman Jon Feliciano will be shut down for the rest of the season after his knee injury didn't fully heal. Feliciano's three-week practice window ended Monday and the Niners decided to keep him on injured reserve instead of activating him. Left guard Aaron Banks, defensive tackle Jordan Elliott and receiver Jacob Cowing all remain in concussion protocol to start this week and their status is unknown. Right guard Dominick Puni (shoulder) and cornerback Deommodore Lenoir (knee) underwent MRIs on Monday and the team is waiting for results. Cornerback Renardo Green (neck) and linebacker Demetrius Flannigan-Fowles (knee) are day to day. Defensive tackle Kevin Givens is expected to return to practice this week after missing the past four games with a groin injury. AP NFL: https://apnews.com/hub/nfl4 easy, comforting bean dishes for fall
2027: Political movements spread as bigwigs plot Tinubu’s ousterChina's fastest CR450 high-speed train prototype unveiled in BeijingChinese film about Covid-19 wins Taiwan's top Golden Horse prizes
Penn State's polarizing QB Drew Allar puts critics on mute and keeps winning gamesHail Flutie: BC celebrates 40th anniversary of Miracle in Miami
The Stock Market’s Most Unbelievable Rally This year, Palantir Technologies has captured the attention of investors with its meteoric rise, seeing its stock skyrocket by 360%. While this surge in value might seem like a golden opportunity, some experts warn it bears eerie similarities to another high-profile spike — Microsoft in the late 1990s. Riding the AI Wave Palantir has been riding a strong wave of enthusiasm due to its advancements in artificial intelligence, particularly its AI platform geared at both governmental and private sectors. Despite these promising developments, concerns are rising that its stock price has surged ahead of its fundamentals. This scenario reminds market insiders of Microsoft’s situation over two decades ago. A Look Back — Microsoft’s Lesson In the late 90s, Microsoft was a star in the stock market, primarily due to the phenomenal success of its Windows operating system. The company’s shares experienced an unprecedented run, leading to inflated valuations. At the peak of this frenzy, investors were paying a staggering 31 times the company’s revenue — a risky move that eventually resulted in a brutal collapse. Is History Repeating Itself? Fast forward to today, Palantir’s valuation metrics rival those of Microsoft in its heyday. With a market cap of $187 billion and revenues around $2.8 billion, Palantir’s numbers raise eyebrows. The excitement around AI might remind investors of past bubbles fueled by unchecked optimism. A Cautionary Tale Investors should heed the past. Much like Microsoft’s valuation took years to recover, Palantir’s soaring market performance might not guarantee steady returns. Although timing the market is nearly impossible, the lesson remains that extreme valuations often precede a fall. As euphoria dims, Palantir’s true value will eventually become clear. Is Palantir the Next Big Tech Bubble? In recent months, Palantir Technologies has been the topic of extensive discussion among investors, mainly due to its astounding 360% stock increase this year. This article delves deeper into the elements influencing this surge and draws parallels with historical stock market trends, especially focusing on Microsoft’s trajectory in the late 1990s. AI Innovations Fueling Growth Palantir has become synonymous with cutting-edge advancements in artificial intelligence. Its AI platform has gained significant traction among both government and private sector clients, setting the company apart in the tech sector. Enthusiasm for AI innovations substantially contributes to its skyrocketing stock value. However, some financial analysts warn against overlooking the company’s fundamentals, suggesting that Palantir’s current valuation may be an overestimation reminiscent of past market bubbles. Similarities to Microsoft’s Late 90s Surge Microsoft’s rise during the late 1990s, driven by the success of its Windows operating system, offers a cautionary precedent. Back then, Microsoft’s shares soared, resulting in seemingly irrational valuations based on investor mania rather than core financial performance. At one point, Microsoft’s stock traded at 31 times its revenue, which eventually led to a market correction. The comparisons with Palantir are becoming more pertinent as the company experiences similar hype around AI. Financial Metrics Under Scrutiny Examining Palantir’s financial indicators provides further context. With a staggering market cap of $187 billion and revenues of merely $2.8 billion, its valuation metrics are indeed under scrutiny. These figures prompt concerns among market insiders who view them through the lens of historical tech surges and subsequent collapses. The current optimism around AI echoes the same unchecked exuberance that has led to previous bubbles. Considering the Risks For potential investors, the story of Palantir serves as a reminder of inherent risks in stock market investments driven by high expectations and visionary innovation. Learning from Microsoft’s experience, it’s essential for investors to remain vigilant and consider the company’s intrinsic value rather than be swayed solely by market hype. Although predicting market movements with accuracy remains a challenge, paying attention to long-term fundamentals is prudent. Future Outlook and Predictions Whether Palantir follows Microsoft’s path of rapid ascension followed by correction remains open to speculation. As the AI landscape continues to evolve, the real test will be whether Palantir can substantiate its valuation with sustained revenue growth and comprehensive AI solutions. Investors and market watchers should keep an eye on updates in the AI domain and related market trends. Palantir’s journey forward carries profound implications for the stock market. As we analyze ongoing trends, it’s crucial to balance optimism in AI with careful financial evaluations. For the latest on tech industry advancements, check out Palantir’s official site .
Inventiva reports 2024 Third Quarter Financial Information1
No Labels National Meeting
Our penultimate report card will not be one the Cowboys want to take home to their parents. One to go, and who knows what will be at stake for Washington next weekend, but the Eagles rolled without Jalen Hurts (and in most of the second half without Kenny Pickett) to score 34 unanswered points. So this can’t be pretty. Offense Yes, the Eagles have one of the league’s best defenses this year. But seven points scored and four turnovers served up ? One of them a pick-six. Cooper Rush is not really a deep threat, and the Cowboys lacked a game-breaking player with CeeDee Lamb out, but one touchdown drive in the first quarter was all the offense had to show in this one. And that was with Rico Dowdle rushing for 104 yards. Grade: F Defense They made Kenny Pickett and Tanner McKee look like legit quarterbacks, and that’s worrisome, but most of that came after the Cowboys’ offense was funneling turnovers to Philly on a regular basis. In the first half, Dallas did what it usually does against Saquon Barkley , limiting him to 3.1 per carry. But in the second half, with the margin mounting, Barkley went for 127 yards on 18 carries. Cornerback Andrew Booth got targeted frequently, but he’s not even supposed to be out there. Grade: C-minus Special teams Nothing game-changing from this group. Brandon Aubrey had a 61-yard field goal clang off an upright, and the Cowboys’ kick coverage team showed it needs work on a couple of Kenneth Gainwell returns. But the biggest thing that happened on special teams was a player most Cowboys fans and probably some teammates had never heard of (Troy Pride?) getting tossed out in a fight. Grade: C Coaching Mike McCarthy said the team was well prepared. Who can say? An instant pick-6 and three more turnovers removed any chance the Cowboys had of competing Sunday afternoon. Injuries are mounting along with the losses now. Time to put the wraps on this season. Grade: C Overall It was 7-7 even after the pick-6. What happened to that level of competition the Cowboys offense was displaying, save for the early interception? An outmanned team got overrun in the second half even though it was painfully obvious that Kellen Moore was going to keep dialing Barkley’s number with a third-string QB on the field. Cowboys were always going to lose this game, but didn’t need to lose by 34. Grade: D-minus ©2024 The Dallas Morning News. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Jadestone Energy plc ( LON:JSE – Get Free Report ) shot up 0.8% during mid-day trading on Friday . The stock traded as high as GBX 24.40 ($0.31) and last traded at GBX 24.40 ($0.31). 136,832 shares changed hands during mid-day trading, a decline of 84% from the average session volume of 838,863 shares. The stock had previously closed at GBX 24.20 ($0.30). Jadestone Energy Trading Up 0.8 % The company has a 50 day simple moving average of GBX 25.01 and a 200 day simple moving average of GBX 28.36. The company has a market capitalization of £131.96 million, a PE ratio of -305.00 and a beta of 1.43. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 2,338.94, a quick ratio of 2.08 and a current ratio of 1.21. Insiders Place Their Bets In other Jadestone Energy news, insider Alexander Paul Blakeley bought 511,000 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction on Wednesday, October 2nd. The shares were acquired at an average cost of GBX 29 ($0.36) per share, with a total value of £148,190 ($186,472.88). 1.45% of the stock is currently owned by corporate insiders. Jadestone Energy Company Profile Jadestone Energy plc operates as an independent oil and gas development and production company in the Asia Pacific region. The company holds 100% operated working interests in the Stag oilfield and Montara project located in offshore Western Australia; and Block 46/07 and Block 51 PSCs located in the Malay Basin, offshore southwest Vietnam. Featured Articles Receive News & Ratings for Jadestone Energy Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Jadestone Energy and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .Three decades after JonBenét Ramsey’s death, her murder remains officially unsolved. But the Little Miss Colorado’s demise lingers as the archetypal crime mystery. Sleuths continue to hash out theories: in bustling and competing Reddit communities, on podcasts and network documentaries . The speculation broadly falls into two opposing camps: Was the murder an inside job by someone in the family, like parents John and Patsy or even older brother Burke? Or did an outside intruder somehow pierce the sanctity of their upscale Boulder home? The case was perplexing from the moment Patsy found a ransom note the morning of December 26, 1996. “Listen carefully,” began the three-page letter. It went on to blame a “foreign faction” for her daughter’s disappearance and requested $118,000 from her husband, Access Graphics CEO John, for her safe return. The onetime Miss West Virginia called 911 in a panic. The note, the FBI later said, felt like it was staged rather than written by a stranger actually seeking ransom after a kidnapping. The suspicion ramped up when John found JonBenét’s body later that day, bound and strangled with a garrote in a small room practically hidden in the home’s basement. Still, the case would not have mushroomed into a frenzy without the sudden flood of footage of JonBenét’s child beauty contests. Before Toddlers & Tiaras turned pageant moms into pop archetypes, the subculture was mostly hidden from view. The eerie footage of the little girl parading around in teased hair and heavy makeup played on an endless loop on 24/7 cable television as broadcasters debated the case nonstop. The parents’ insulation with lawyers and spokespeople only heightened suspicions. The theories proliferated. Eventually, in 1998, a grand jury was convened to hear charges against the Ramseys, but as far as most people remember, nothing came of it. Without a trial to sift through fact and fiction, a content boom took over: books, scripted TV movies, documentaries, and the then-emerging landscape of true-crime message boards and forums. The cycle continues. Reddit has replaced message boards and Usenet forums. Theories have zoomed in on specific family members. And a new scripted series is forthcoming on Paramount+ , starring Melissa McCarthy as Patsy and Clive Owen as John. Netflix’s Cold Case: Who Killed JonBenét Ramsey, directed by Joe Berlinger, doesn’t really offer a new take. The three-part documentary series makes the case for an intruder, but it does so by focusing on police and prosecutorial missteps, a current trend in true-crime content. Berlinger directed 1996’s Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hills , which centered on three teenagers — known as the West Memphis Three — convicted of murdering four boys. The documentary examined the moral panic incited by violent murders of children, and his work was widely credited with helping free the teens. Cold Case asks many of the same questions about agendas and power that Paradise Lost did. The filmmakers have the cooperation of John, who remarried after Patsy’s death from ovarian cancer in 2006 and now lives in Utah. Paula Woodward, a journalist who wrote two books about the case with his cooperation, is also a major talking head. But unlike the West Memphis Three, the affluent Ramseys were not unsophisticated, working-poor teens in rural America. And in trying to make a simplistic case for railroading, the documentary skips over cultural nuances that could make for a more definitive account of the story. Cold Case starts with the confusion at the Ramsey home on the day after the murder. The police officers involved in the investigation did not talk to Berlinger. But in the docuseries, John claims cops and reporters promoted misinformation. John points out that after his discovery of JonBenét’s body, Linda Arndt, a detective on the scene, became convinced he did it. She later gave an infamous interview saying a nonverbal exchange with John led to her conclusion. But John, CEO of a company that reached $1 billion in sales that year, was treated deferentially by police from the start. Officers viewed him and Patsy as victims of a kidnapping, not potential suspects. Cops didn’t seal off the home like a crime scene. Instead, they called in victim advocates, and the Ramseys called friends from the neighborhood to their home for emotional support. Arguably, the scene was hopelessly contaminated and any conclusive answers that could have emerged almost certainly died that day. That wasn’t because the police suspected the Ramseys, but rather, the opposite: because they didn’t. Still, the series claims that law enforcement painted the Ramseys in a bad light. Cops said there were no footsteps in the snow to indicate an intruder when, according to John, it hadn’t snowed. He claims police leaked that John had flown back to their second home in Atlanta with JonBenét’s casket in his plane when, in fact, he had done no such thing. Still, the FBI agreed an intruder was unlikely and suggested examining the family first. The police pursued leads that JonBenét might have been sexually abused. The series takes issue with the consideration of evidence that JonBenét’s bed-wetting was getting worse at the time of the murder, and this can be a sign of sexual abuse. In the series, John shrugs as he dismisses the police’s consultation with former Miss America Marilyn Van Derbur, an expert on incest, who cautioned police that a “normal,” image-conscious father and family wasn’t evidence of a lack of abuse. But the police soon moved on from John to Patsy. Detective Steve Thomas settled on the theory that Patsy had murdered her daughter. He believed that with her 40th birthday approaching, she snapped due to a bed-wetting. It’s telling that Thomas’s theory was ultimately the one that took off. He had more power in the department than Arndt, who thought Patsy was innocent. True-crime cases are always a mix of human interest and forensics, as evidenced by the series’s focus on the media’s portrayals of the Ramseys as unsympathetic. Still, Cold Case never quite acknowledges how, early on, even intimate friends of both Ramseys found their lack of cooperation with police unethical. John and Patsy gave DNA samples in 1996 but refused to come to police headquarters for an official interrogation . Instead, in an early January 1997 interview on CNN , a subdued Patsy declared a “killer on the loose.” In April, they finally went to police headquarters . Did their class entitlement contribute to confusion between them and friends and police? By framing them unilaterally as underdogs, the documentary leaves that question unanswered. The series instead focuses on the more extreme examples of the media’s witch hunt at the time. On the talk show Geraldo, a mock trial took place and a so-called expert claimed a video of JonBenét swinging a trumpet was evidence of sexual abuse; one panelist called her a “tarted-up miniature-dwarf hooker.” Cold Case ’s binary understanding of the battle lines limits its insight. According to Lawrence Schiller’s massive 2000 book about the investigation, Perfect Murder, Perfect Town , the Boulder DA had a liberal culture, emphasizing community policing and plea bargaining instead of going to trial. Detective Thomas was out of step with Boulder’s liberal culture. District Attorney Alex Hunter didn’t accept Thomas’s claims about Patsy. In 1998, Hunter brought in detective Lou Smit because Smit had solved one case involving a murder and abduction. Smit later claimed the Ramseys were people of faith and couldn’t have murdered their daughter. He offered an unproven “stun gun” theory, claiming that two marks on JonBenét’s skin were about the size of a stun gun used to keep her quiet, which would point to an intruder. The documentary re-platforms these claims, and the series presents Smit, uncritically, as the “Sherlock Holmes of his time.” But Smit’s police work, as much as Arndt’s and Thomas’s, comes off as heavily influenced by their personal biases. Arndt’s work with women survivors shaped how she viewed Patsy as a victim and John as a perpetrator. Thomas’s dislike of Patsy bordered on misogynist confusion about women snapping at 40. Smit’s bonding with them over religion was equally unprofessional. Hunter ultimately sent the case to a grand jury in 1998, and both Thomas and Smit testified . The grand jury voted to indict the Ramseys for child endangerment. In his 1999 announcement after the grand jury concluded its work, DA Hunter said there was insufficient evidence for prosecution. He arguably protected the Ramseys by not airing out the grand jury’s decision — seemingly, per Schiller’s book, to protect himself from the political fallout either way. Both Thomas and Smit resigned in protest. It’s unclear if the Ramseys knew the grand jury voted to indict them. The world was in the dark about this development until a judge forced the release of the charging documents in 2013. Instead, the Ramseys were very active non-suspects. They wrote a best-selling book about their alleged persecution by police, The Death of Innocence . Michael Tracey, a communications professor, made a documentary with them about the supposed media witch hunt. He reappears in Cold Case as a talking head. The last episode investigates old leads about potential suspects from the pageant circuit that never went anywhere. But the most revealing aspect of the final episode is how much the series seems to be in the dark about the police or FBI theories. Early on, the series makes the point that DNA evidence found on JonBenét — on items of clothing and under her fingernails —pointed away from the family and that the police hid the information. But by the end, the docuseries admits that it’s still unclear whether that genetic material, which might just be degraded touch DNA, can exonerate or implicate anyone at all. Cold Case seems confused about the fact that this case is, in some ways, an exception. Many elements of the case — from the length of the ransom note and the improbability of a stranger kidnapping for ransom to the discovery of an alleged kidnapping victim in her own home — make it a difficult case to universalize. In 2008, Mary Lacy, the new Boulder district attorney, took the unusual, unprecedented step of apologizing to the Ramseys and seemingly exonerating them. “I’d get letters from people for years that say, ‘Oh, I’m so sorry,’” John says in the documentary. How could they not? “That’s what you were told by the media, by the police,” he says. The series’s portrait of John, now a remarried grandfather, bears no trace of the litigious figure who hired Trump attorney L. Lin Wood early on to sue media outlets for libel. (That attorney has since been disbarred .) John ran for a congressional seat as a Republican and wrote two more books claiming innocence. John’s domination of the narrative — both in the docuseries and in his books — has helped occlude the fact that it was the “Patsy did it” theory that allowed the case to even land before a grand jury. This raises its own questions. Is there a gendered element involved in cases where victims become suspects? Most parents — and mothers — without the Ramsey resources would have been easily railroaded. It might be too much to expect this docuseries to offer some kind of wider context or patterns about the limitations of police or their relationship with district attorneys, and none is provided. Instead, in trying to present John’s perspective as the objective truth, Cold Case unintentionally highlights the fraught nature of all the legal and forensic facts in this case. In some ways, the series functions best as a corrective to some of the more irresponsible instances of platformed conspiracies — for instance, the 2017 CBS special that accused Burke of killing his sister, which he denies. A film from that same year, the faux docudrama Casting JonBenet, took a different route. Interviewing actors from the Boulder area for a supposed casting for a scripted series about the Ramseys, the film brought out their speculations and direct connections to the case. It was a subtle unpacking of how the Boulder community made sense of the murder over time. And ultimately, the case remains compelling as gothic-spectacle sleuth bait. For those who think the Ramseys did it, the case speaks to the idea that evil is within, that money and power can cover up abuse within families. For those who believe in an intruder, the story confirms the notion that evil lurks outside. Cold Case presents that latter story in its most coherent form yet. But it won’t be enough to put the speculation to rest.IKE Tech, Privately roll out biometric age assurance to curb underage vaping
Security up amid threat to kill Marcos
